Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 24965

Linear representations of algebras and groups, Lie theory, associative algebras, multilinear algebra.

4 votes
1 answer
197 views

Can we have a nontrivial division of a irreducible root system as the union of two closed su...

The question is related to this MO question. Let $(\Phi, E)$ be a irreducible crystallographic root system where $\Phi$ is the set of all roots and $E$ is the $\mathbb{R}$-span of $\Phi$. As in the st …
20 votes
2 answers
3k views

Is there any "deep" relation between the localization theorem of equivariant cohomology and ...

First let's consider equivariant cohomology: if a compact Lie group $G$ acts on a compact manifold $M$. We have the equivariant cohomology $ H_G(M)$ defined as the cohomology of the cochain complex $( …
2 votes
1 answer
526 views

Kasparov's Dirac element and the index map

In Kasparov's 1988 paper Equivariant KK-theory and the Novikov conjecture section 4 he defined the Dirac element for a (non-spin) $G$- Riemanian manifold $X$ as an element in the $K$-homology $K^0_G(C …
0 votes
1 answer
209 views

When does the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial $P_{x,w}(q)$ not vanish at $q=1$?

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a semisimple Lie algebra and $\mathfrak{h}$ be a Cartan subalgebra. For any $\lambda\in \mathfrak{h}^{*}$ let $M(\lambda)$ and $L(\lambda)$ be the Verma module and the simple mo …
4 votes
2 answers
787 views

What are the "tensor-closed" object of the BGG category $\mathcal{O}$ of a semisimple Lie al...

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra and we can consider its BGG category $\mathcal{O}$. It is well-known that $\mathcal{O}$ is not closed under tensor product, i. …
4 votes
0 answers
154 views

Is one of the hyperplane partitions of a irreducible root system always generate the whole W...

Let $\Delta$ be a irreducible root system and $\Delta^+$ be its positive roots. We say a subset $\Delta^{\prime}\subset \Delta^+$ can generate the Weyl group if reflections of roots in $\Delta^{\prim …
3 votes

Can we have a nontrivial division of a irreducible root system as the union of two closed su...

$\def\abs#1{\lvert#1\rvert}\DeclareMathOperator\Span{Span}$I think I get a proof inspired by the comment of @LSpice. First we can prove that $\Phi_1\setminus \Phi_2$ is orthogonal to $\Phi_2\setminus …
LSpice's user avatar
  • 12.9k
1 vote
1 answer
238 views

Can we have a nontrivial division of a irreducible root system as $\Phi=\Phi_{[\lambda]}\cup...

Let $(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h},\Phi)$ be a root system of a complex simple Lie algebra, where $\Phi$ is the set of all roots. For each $\alpha\in \Phi$, let $\alpha^{\vee}=2\alpha/(\alpha,\alpha)$ be …
1 vote

Can we have a nontrivial division of a irreducible root system as $\Phi=\Phi_{[\lambda]}\cup...

I think the answer is yes because $(\Phi_{[\lambda]})^{\vee}$ and $(\Phi_{[\mu]})^{\vee}$ are closed sub-root systems of the dual root system $\Phi^{\vee}$. Closed means if $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are ro …
Zhaoting Wei's user avatar
  • 9,019
10 votes
3 answers
632 views

Is the tensor product of two infinite dimensional objects in the BGG category $\mathcal{O}$ ...

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra (according to a comment of Victor Ostrik, we need to further require that $\mathfrak{g}$ is simple) and we can consider its BG …
5 votes
2 answers
915 views

Could we define the semi-direct product of two universal enveloping algebras?

If we have two Lie algebras $\mathfrak{g}$ and $\mathfrak{h}$ over a field $k$, and if we have a Lie algebra homomorphism $\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \text{Der}_k(\mathfrak{h})$, then we can define the s …
7 votes
0 answers
166 views

How to characterize the class of $(\mathfrak{g},K)$-modules with a fixed lowest K-type in th...

Let $G$ be a real semisimple Lie group, $K$ be a maximal compact subgroup. Let $\mathfrak{g}_0$ and $\mathfrak{k}_0$ be their real Lie algebras respectively. Let $\mathfrak{g}$ and $\mathfrak{k}$ be t …
3 votes
0 answers
264 views

What's the relation of the Hecke algebra of a pair and the flag variety?

Let $G$ be a real semisimple Lie group and $K$ a maximal compact subgroup. Let $\mathfrak{g}$ and $\mathfrak{k}$ be the complexified Lie algebra of $G$ and $K$, respectively. Then the Hecke algebra …
3 votes

Closure relations between Bruhat cells on the flag variety

For a first introduction you can read Michel Brion's "http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0410240v1.pdf". He gives a nice introduction (for G=GL(n)) in Section 1. I'm not sure whether your curve method works b …
Community's user avatar
  • 1
1 vote
Accepted

Relationship between Verma modules and delta functions

In general cases Verma modules are corresponding to D-modules on flag variety and then via Riemann-Hilbert correspondence to constructible sheaves on flag variety. Hence the suitable generalization of …
Zhaoting Wei's user avatar
  • 9,019

15 30 50 per page