Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 23648

forcing, large cardinals, descriptive set theory, infinite combinatorics, cardinal characteristics, forcing axioms, ultrapowers, measures, reflection, pcf theory, models of set theory, axioms of set theory, independence, axiom of choice, continuum hypothesis, determinacy, Borel equivalence relations, Boolean-valued models, embeddings, orders, relations, transfinite recursion, set theory as a foundation of mathematics, the philosophy of set theory.

2 votes
1 answer
139 views

Are Cohen Generics Minimal Covers?

Are Cohen generics (in $2^\omega$) minimal covers? I'm ultimately interested in this question for some more effective notion of forcing but I realized I wasn't sure how to show this even assuming full …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
6 votes
2 answers
262 views

Extending polynomial hierarchy above $\omega$

The arithmetic hierarchy is naturally extended to all ordinals via ordinal notations creating a hierarchy for all hyperarithmetic sets. The polynomial time hierarchy is defined analogously to the ari …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
10 votes
1 answer
459 views

What is the least $\alpha$ such that $L_\alpha$ contains a non-measurable set

What is the least level of the constructable hierarchy that contains a non-measurable (Lebesgue) subset of $2^\omega$. If it makes a difference assume we are working inside L (V=L). I'm pretty sure it …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
2 votes

Hyperarithmetically least elements in $\Pi^1_1$ sets

I'm pretty sure the claim isn't even true for every $\Pi^0_1$ class (working in $\omega^\omega$ or $\Pi^0_2$ if working in $2^\omega$). It's well known that one can produce a recursive tree in $\omeg …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
1 vote

Harrington's notes on McLaughlin/Arithmetically incomparable singletons

Thanks to the individual who helped me out (not sure if they want to be publicly identified). Since I'm sure Leo wouldn't mind I'm posting a link to the McLaughlin notes here (I'll add the other one …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
2 votes
1 answer
132 views

Harrington's notes on McLaughlin/Arithmetically incomparable singletons

At one point I had copies of the handwritten notes Leo created about the McLaughlin conjecture and I know a similar set of notes exist titled Arithmetically incomparable arithmetic singletons. I've s …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
5 votes

Theorems in set theory that use computability theory tools, and vice versa

My favorite are the results in computability theory that rely on Martin's cone theorem (if A is sufficiently definable degree invariant set (Certainly if Borel but I think more) then either A or it's …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
1 vote
0 answers
73 views

Standard terminology for node in tree with multiple children

Is there a standard terminology for a node in a tree that has multiple children? For instance, in describing in perfect tree in $\omega^{< \omega}$ how would you describe the nodes that are extended b …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
1 vote

Can this naïve-like set theory using acyclic membership be consistent?

I misread comprehension the first time. Now that I understand it correctly can't you construct the standard Russell set: $\phi(y) = \lnot y \in^{*} y$ So let's ask if the resulting $x$ satisfies $x \ …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
1 vote
Accepted

Is set of the indices of c.e.sets that cover a productive set also productive one?

No, it isn't. This is a consequence of the fact that we have a choice of infinitely many equivalent indices for each c.e. set. Let $E$ be a set of indices such that $$(e, j \in E \land e \neq j) \i …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
3 votes

On Applications of Forcing in Domain Theory

Note that forcing techniques are frequently used in computability theory, e.g., to establish the existence of degrees with certain properties. I refer the reader to Odifreddi's Handbook of Computabil …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
3 votes

On independence and large cardinal strength of physical statements

In my opinion one of the best examples of a physical statement depending on a mathematically independent statement is provided by Malament-Hogarth machines (You can find a bunch of other links just by …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
1 vote
1 answer
239 views

In NBG (ZFC + classes) if $P$ nonempty predicate of classes must $P$ have definable solution?

Let $A, B, C..X, Y$ range over potentially proper classes in NBG set theory (or adding class quantification to ZFC in obvious way) and $x,y,z$ range over sets. Since I don't know the proper symbols …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
4 votes
1 answer
568 views

Definition of HYP in $L_{\omega_1^{CK}}[a]$?

The structure $L_{\omega_1^{CK}}$ consists of only HYP sets (I believe) and HYP in this structure is the same as the actual hyperaritmetic sets. Now if I move to the structure $L_{\omega_1^{CK}}[a]$ …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029
6 votes
0 answers
248 views

$\omega$-models of $\mathbf{\Sigma^1_1}-DC$ and $\mathbf{\Delta^1_1}-CA$

So what is needed to demonstrate something (say like $L_{\omega_1^{CK}}[a]$ is a $\omega$-models of $\mathbf{\Sigma^1_1}$-$DC$ or $\mathbf{\Delta^1_1}$-$CA$? It's not like I don't understand what the …
Peter Gerdes's user avatar
  • 3,029