Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Hamiltonian systems, symplectic flows, classical integrable systems
13
votes
What is so geometric about symplectic geometry?
I think the question is about "geometric intuition" and "geometric understanding", ill defined as those may be. Perhaps that can be answered with some comparisons. I'll be a bit lazy and just take exa …
1
vote
Terminology for exact symplectomorphism
In his classic book on classical mechanics Whittaker calls these transformations Mathieu transformations. The term appears in Wikipedia.
2
votes
When is the time evolution of a Hamiltonian system described by the geodesic flow on a Riema...
There is the paper ARE HAMILTONIAN FLOWS GEODESIC FLOWS?
by CHRISTOPHER MCCORD, KENNETH R. MEYER, AND DANIEL OFFIN which treats this problem and gives examples of Hamiltonian flows (most cases of the …
12
votes
Accepted
Does every manifold admit a Lagrangian Riemannian metric?
The distribution of horizontal subspaces is always Lagrangian not only for Riemannian metrics, but also for the Ehresmann connection associated to Finsler metrics and for the Levi-Civita connection of …
8
votes
What is a Lagrangian submanifold intuitively?
Interestingly enough no one wrote about the first examples of Lagrangian manifolds in symplectic geometry. In the first papers on symplectic geometry (Theory of Systems of Rays, 1828), William R. Hami …
2
votes
Accepted
Non-Reeb vector fields on the three-sphere
The answer is yes.
Proposition. Let $\alpha$ be the standard contact form on the three-sphere (for which the Reeb vector field is the Hopf vector field $X$). If $f$ is a strictly positive function o …
11
votes
Accepted
Reeb flows on $S^3$ versus volume preserving flows
I took the time to give a clean version of the answer and to eliminate the dependence on really hard theorems.
Construction of geodesible, volume-preserving flows on $S^3$ that are not Reeb flows for …
3
votes
The importance of differentiable dynamics from outside dynamics? (mainly topology)
Here is an application with which I have first hand experience.
In the sixties J.J. Schaeffer conjectured that the girth of a normed space---the infimum of the lengths of all continuous curves on its …
7
votes
Accepted
What is the geometric interpretation of this quantity?
Both limits (1) and (2) are equal to $C(1)/V(1)$ because of the homogeneity of the volume and the symplectic capacity. Namely, the symplectic form is homogeneous of degree $1$ with respect to dilation …
12
votes
Accepted
Intuition for Levi-Civita connection via Hamiltonian flows
The intuition is that the Levi-Civita connection corresponds to the linearization of the geodesic flow plus a simple projective-geometric construction:
Let $c(t)$ be an orbit of the geodesic flow (pr …
5
votes
Known size invariant for Riemannian manifolds?
Remark. Now that Cadoi has disclosed the origin of the invariant (which was absent from the original formulation of the problem) my musings in trying to guess the symplectic geometry behind it seem a …
2
votes
Accepted
Analytic Lagrangian Submanifolds
Dear Hapchiu,
To understand the generating function construction of Lagrangian submanifolds I recommend the following:
Take the few pages in "Geometric Asymptotics" by Guillemin and Sternberg, wher …
11
votes
Accepted
is the geodesic flow on Hyperbolic Plane completely integrable?
Yes, the geodesic flow on the hyperbolic plane and, in fact, on any Hadamard manifold (${\mathbb R}^n$ provided with a complete Riemannian metric with non-positive curvature) is integrable.
You can …
9
votes
Is there a coordinate-free proof of the hamiltonian character of the geodesic flow?
This is a very particular case of something more general: extremals for a non-degenerate Lagrangian correspond to solutions of the corresponding Hamiltonian system. There is no need to use connections …