Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.
15
votes
Accepted
Who proved the motivic 6-functor formalism?
My understanding is that Scholze was citing Gallauer for the universal property of the 6FF of motivic spectra (an unpublished result as far as I know), not for the existence of the 6FF. This result wa …
29
votes
Accepted
Voevodsky's six functor formalism VS Lucas Mann's
There may be some confusion in this question about what exactly Voevodsky/Ayoub and Mann do, as they do very different things.
Mann's thesis constructs a formalism of six operations in the setting of …
13
votes
What is the dual of the stable infinity category of perfect complex on smooth proper variety?
It is self-dual. In general the dual of a smooth proper $R$-linear $\infty$-category $C$ is always $C^{\operatorname{op}}$, but for a scheme $X$ we have $\operatorname{Perf}(X) = \operatorname{Perf}(X …
13
votes
Accepted
If we replace the spectrally ringed space in the definition of a spectral scheme with an arb...
Yes, they are more general. This is in fact already the case with ordinary rings. Let's call a classically-ringed $\infty$-topos which is locally the Zariski $\infty$-topos of an affine scheme an $\in …
5
votes
Accepted
Motivic cohomology with $\mathbb{Z}/2$ coefficients in positive characteristic
This holds if the characteristic of $k$ is not 2, and it follows from the Milnor conjecture proved by Voevodsky.
Voevodsky ultimately proved the following (Theorem 6.17 in https://annals.math.princeto …
11
votes
Accepted
How duality follows from a six functor formalism
Your description of the six functors does not mention any relations between the $!$-functors and the $*$-functors or the tensor product, which is where these dualities are hiding.
Poincaré duality is …
6
votes
Accepted
Construction of the universal covering space of the etale homotopy type $Et(X)$
Such an "étale universal cover" exists at least if $X$ is Noetherian and geometrically unibranch (and for all qcqs $X$ if one considers profinite étale homotopy types).
Background. I will regard the é …
6
votes
Accepted
The universal multiset for a finite scheme - reference request
I have seen the morphishm $\nu\colon (A^{\otimes n})^{\Sigma_n}\to k$ in a couple of places:
On page 81 of
A. Suslin, V. Voevodsky, Singular homology of abstract algebraic varieties
It is defined wh …
11
votes
Determinantal identities for perfect complexes
The formula also holds for perfect complexes. This can be deduced from the case of vector bundles, although it requires a lot of structure in that case. Namely, we need to use the fact that the determ …
5
votes
Accepted
descent implies hyperdescent
It is certainly true that descent implies hyperdescent whenever $\mathcal C$ is a $n$-category for some $n<\infty$ (it wasn't clear from your question whether you knew this or not). This is because, f …
3
votes
Accepted
Etale sheaves on algebraic spaces vs. Etale sheaves on affines
Yes, the two $\infty$-topoi are equivalent. Let $u: \mathrm{Aff} \to \mathrm{AlgSp}$ be the inclusion. Then $u$ preserves étale covering families and pullbacks, hence commutes with the formation of th …
10
votes
Accepted
$2$-fiber product is a scheme then map of stacks is representable
This is not true even if $\mathcal X$ is an Artin stack. For example, let $G$ be a smooth group scheme over the base $T$, and let $\mathbf BG$ be its classifying stack (the category of $G$-torsors fib …
16
votes
Accepted
$BG$ the stack, $BG$ the simplicial presheaf
The two constructions are not quite equivalent. Let me write $\mathbf BG$ for the stack and $B_\bullet G$ for the simplicial scheme to better distinguish between them. There is a third relevant player …
5
votes
A question about the vanishing of motivic cohomology in negative Tate twist
Here's an easy way to see this (which is more or less an elaboration of Mikhail's answer):
Suppose $i > 0$ and $n\in \mathbb Z$. We have the Thom isomorphism
$$
H^n(X, \mathbb Z(-i)) \cong H^{n+2i}_X …
6
votes
Accepted
Is this Mayer-Vietoris sequence motivic?
I'm not sure if that's exactly what you mean by "being motivic", but this long exact sequence comes from a triangle in Voevodsky's category of (integral) motives $DM(\mathbb Q)$.
More generally if $ …