Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 153260

Schrodinger operators, operators on manifolds, general differential operators, numerical studies, integral operators, discrete models, resonances, non-self-adjoint operators, random operators/matrices

3 votes
Accepted

Leibniz rule for square root of Laplacian

For the Leibniz rule, it is not true that \begin{equation} (-\Delta)^{\frac12}(fg) = f (-\Delta)^{\frac12}g + g (-\Delta)^{\frac12}f \end{equation} even in the simplest possible case, i.e. in $\mathbb …
an_ordinary_mathematician's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Is the spectrum of a "self adjoint" operator real on $\ell^p$?

It seems that I have found a counter example myself. For the Hilbert matrix $$ H_\lambda:= \big( \frac{1}{1-\lambda+k+n} \big)_{k,n\geq 0}, \lambda < 1 $$ Rosenblum in "On the Hilbert Matrix I, Pro …
an_ordinary_mathematician's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
465 views

Is the spectrum of a "self adjoint" operator real on $\ell^p$?

There might be an obvious answer to the question, but it doesn't come to mind. Suppose we have an infinite matrix $A=(a_{ij})$, which defines a bounded linear operator on $\ell^p$, i.e. for all seque …
an_ordinary_mathematician's user avatar