Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 118688

Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.

2 votes
1 answer
879 views

Characterisation of (integrable) connections on (trivial) principal bundle

Let $M$ be a manifold. Let $G$ be a Lie group and $\mathfrak{g}$ be its Lie algebra. Let $P(M,G)$ be a principal bundle. Recall that, a connection on $P(M,G)$ is a distribution $\mathcal{H}\subseteq …
12 votes
4 answers
2k views

Motivation for definition of Quotient stack

I am reading "Some notes on Differentiable stacks" by J. Heinloth. In that paper, the notion of quotient stack is defined as follows. Let $G$ be a Lie group action on a manifold $X$ (left action). We …
8 votes
2 answers
3k views

What does reduction of structure group of principal bundle say?

$\DeclareMathOperator\GL{GL}\DeclareMathOperator\SO{SO}$Let $G$ be a Lie group and $\pi:P\rightarrow M$ be a principal $G$ bundle. The notion of reduction of structure group is standard but I will rec …
79 votes
9 answers
21k views

Results that are widely accepted but no proof has appeared

The background of this question is the talk given by Kevin Buzzard. I could not find the slides of that talk. The slides of another talk given by Kevin Buzzard along the same theme are available here. …
3 votes
1 answer
265 views

"Covering-flat" part in definition of morphism of sites

Let $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{I})$ and $(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{J})$ be sites where $\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{D}$ are categories and $\mathcal{I}$ and $\mathcal{J}$ are Grothendieck topologies on $\mathcal{C …
5 votes
2 answers
365 views

stacks that are not necessarily fibered in groupoids appearing in algebraic geometry and dif...

Question: What are (some of) the stacks (occurring in algebraic/differential geometry) that are fibered in arbitrary categories and not necessarily in groupoids? In the notes Notes on Grothendieck t …
20 votes
7 answers
3k views

What are the occurrences of stacks outside algebraic geometry, differential geometry, and ge...

What are the occurrences of the notion of a stack outside algebraic geometry, differential geometry, and general topology? In most of the references, the introduction of the notion of a stack takes …
0 votes

A presentation of an algebraic stack is epi. in etale topology

A "similar" result along with proof can be found as Lemma 2.14 of Differentiable Stacks and Gerbes. I would like to give more details if you want.
Praphulla Koushik's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
745 views

Are cohomology functors sheaves?

Question is the following: Is the functor $H^n_{dR}:\text{Man}\rightarrow \text{Set}$ a sheaf with respect to open cover topology on $\text{Man}$? More generally, are cohomology functors sheaves in …
9 votes
1 answer
442 views

Results in “generalised smooth spaces” that did not hold in the case of smooth manifolds

Consider the category of smooth manifolds $\text{Man}$. I quote from n-lab page: Manifolds are fantastic spaces. It’s a pity that there aren’t more of them. I understand that this category $\text{Ma …
2 votes
0 answers
88 views

Examples of strictification of a weak category obtained from a generalisation of a strict ca...

I have made the following observation (hopefully a correct one) when reading the paper Orbifolds as stacks: They start with the strict $2$-category category of Lie groupoids, functors, natural transfo …
5 votes
5 answers
2k views

Terminology introduced in recent years with more than one meaning

Suppose a term(inology) is recently (in last 20 years) introduced in research mathematics. It might happen that some one who wish to use it, in the same area of research, for different purposes or se …
18 votes
4 answers
3k views

When (why) did we allow manifolds to be non-Hausdorff and/or non-second countable?

I was reading David Carchedi's answer for a question on Grothendieck topology for a non-small category. It "reads" like people "choose" if they allow manifolds to be Hausdorff and/or second countable. …
5 votes

Terminology introduced in recent years with more than one meaning

The word “topological stack” has at least three usages: A stack $\mathcal{D}\rightarrow \text{Top}$ is said to be a topological stack if there is a a morphism of stacks $p: \underline{M}\rightarrow …
Praphulla Koushik's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
632 views

Size issues (small/large categories) when defining stacks in the Algebraic/differentiable/to...

Angelo Vistoli in the notes Notes on Grothendieck topologies, fibered categories and descent theory starts the section of category theory with the following note: We will not distinguish between s …

15 30 50 per page