Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
15
votes
Latest status of core model theory?
The following may not be an answer to your question, but I think it is related.
I have taken it from the introduction of a joint work I am doing with James Cummings and Sy Friedman (which has now appe …
9
votes
2
answers
442
views
Determinacy and Woodin cardinals
I am looking for a reference for the following result:
Theorem Assume $\kappa$ is a Woodin cardinal. Then after forcing with the Levy collapse $\mathbb{P}=Col(\omega, \kappa)$, the $\Sigma^1_2$-deter …
14
votes
Accepted
How badly can the GCH fail globally?
In the Foreman-Woodin model The generalized continuum hypothesis can fail everywhere.
for each infinite cardinal $\kappa, 2^\kappa$ is weakly inaccessible.
This answers your last question. The answer …
15
votes
Accepted
A proper class of ordinals without an infinite constructible subset
Stanley, M. C., A cardinal preserving immune partition of the ordinals, Fundam. Math. 148, No. 3, 199-221 (1995). ZBL0843.03028.
An infinite set (or class) of ordinals is said to be immune if it nei …
12
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Necessary use of large cardinals in mathematics [duplicate]
There are some statements, whose consistency (or the consistency of their negation) require the existence of large cardinals (in the sense that if the statement (or its negation) is consistent, then i …
21
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Philosophical arguments in defense (or against) large cardinals
The question is essentially what is asked in the title. I split it into two parts
(A) (Arguments supporting the existence of large cardinals) What are the main philosophical arguments in defense o …
11
votes
Accepted
Coding the universe into a real over better core models
For measurable cardinals, the answer is yes and is due to Sy Friedman. See Coding Over a Measurable Cardinal.
There is some difficulty to extend the result to the context of Woodin cardinals, see Gen …
9
votes
1
answer
719
views
Reinhardt cardinals and iterability
Work in $ZF$. Let $j:V\to V$ be a non-trivial elementary embedding which is iterable, so that we can iterate it and form models $M_\alpha, \alpha\in ON,$ with $M_0=V,$ and elementary embeddings $j_{\a …
6
votes
Accepted
Tree property at weak inaccessibles
In his paper Boolean extensions which efface the Mahlo property William Boos proves the following consistency result:
Theorem. Assume GCH holds and $\kappa$ is weakly compact. Then there exists a card …
26
votes
1
answer
1k
views
categorical characterization of large cardinals
Question 1. Is there a categorical representation of Kunen's inconsistency result?
Question 2. Is there a categorical characterization of very large cardinals (in particular for strong and supercomp …
5
votes
categorical characterization of large cardinals
In the paper Proof theory and set theory Takeuti has given such a characterization for measurable cardinals, strongly compact cardinals, supercompact cardinals and even large cardinals.
Let me first …
28
votes
Does Con(ZF + Reinhardt) really imply Con(ZFC + I0)?
The answer to your question is (almost) yes (almost is because of the addition of DC to the statement).
Recently Gabriel Goldberg has proved
''Con(NBG+DC+Reinhardt)$ \implies$ Con(ZFC+I0)''.
…
12
votes
0
answers
372
views
Singular Jonsson cardinals
Is the following consistent?
$(*)$: There exists a singular cardinal $\kappa$ such that :
(1) $\kappa$ is a Jonsson cardinal,
(2) $\kappa$ is not a fixed point of the $\aleph-$function, i.e., $\kappa …
3
votes
Accepted
The axiom $I_0$ in the absence of $AC$
It is consistent that $AC$ fails and there exists a non-trivial elementary embedding $j: L(V_{\lambda+1}) \to L(V_{\lambda+1})$ with $crit(j) < \lambda,$
and $\lambda$ has uncountable cofinality. See …
14
votes
1
answer
717
views
The axiom $I_0$ in the absence of $AC$
It is well-known that if $AC$ holds and if $j: L(V_{\lambda+1}) \to L(V_{\lambda+1})$ is a non-trivial elementary embedding with $crit(j) < \lambda,$
then $\lambda$ has countable cofinality (and in fa …