Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 11115
15 votes

Latest status of core model theory?

The following may not be an answer to your question, but I think it is related. I have taken it from the introduction of a joint work I am doing with James Cummings and Sy Friedman (which has now appe …
Martin Sleziak's user avatar
9 votes
2 answers
442 views

Determinacy and Woodin cardinals

I am looking for a reference for the following result: Theorem Assume $\kappa$ is a Woodin cardinal. Then after forcing with the Levy collapse $\mathbb{P}=Col(\omega, \kappa)$, the $\Sigma^1_2$-deter …
14 votes
Accepted

How badly can the GCH fail globally?

In the Foreman-Woodin model The generalized continuum hypothesis can fail everywhere. for each infinite cardinal $\kappa, 2^\kappa$ is weakly inaccessible. This answers your last question. The answer …
Noah Schweber's user avatar
15 votes
Accepted

A proper class of ordinals without an infinite constructible subset

Stanley, M. C., A cardinal preserving immune partition of the ordinals, Fundam. Math. 148, No. 3, 199-221 (1995). ZBL0843.03028. An infinite set (or class) of ordinals is said to be immune if it nei …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.7k
12 votes
3 answers
1k views

Necessary use of large cardinals in mathematics [duplicate]

There are some statements, whose consistency (or the consistency of their negation) require the existence of large cardinals (in the sense that if the statement (or its negation) is consistent, then i …
21 votes
2 answers
2k views

Philosophical arguments in defense (or against) large cardinals

The question is essentially what is asked in the title. I split it into two parts (A) (Arguments supporting the existence of large cardinals) What are the main philosophical arguments in defense o …
11 votes
Accepted

Coding the universe into a real over better core models

For measurable cardinals, the answer is yes and is due to Sy Friedman. See Coding Over a Measurable Cardinal. There is some difficulty to extend the result to the context of Woodin cardinals, see Gen …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
719 views

Reinhardt cardinals and iterability

Work in $ZF$. Let $j:V\to V$ be a non-trivial elementary embedding which is iterable, so that we can iterate it and form models $M_\alpha, \alpha\in ON,$ with $M_0=V,$ and elementary embeddings $j_{\a …
6 votes
Accepted

Tree property at weak inaccessibles

In his paper Boolean extensions which efface the Mahlo property William Boos proves the following consistency result: Theorem. Assume GCH holds and $\kappa$ is weakly compact. Then there exists a card …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.7k
26 votes
1 answer
1k views

categorical characterization of large cardinals

Question 1. Is there a categorical representation of Kunen's inconsistency result? Question 2. Is there a categorical characterization of very large cardinals (in particular for strong and supercomp …
5 votes

categorical characterization of large cardinals

In the paper Proof theory and set theory Takeuti has given such a characterization for measurable cardinals, strongly compact cardinals, supercompact cardinals and even large cardinals. Let me first …
Asaf Karagila's user avatar
  • 39.7k
28 votes

Does Con(ZF + Reinhardt) really imply Con(ZFC + I0)?

The answer to your question is (almost) yes (almost is because of the addition of DC to the statement). Recently Gabriel Goldberg has proved ''Con(NBG+DC+Reinhardt)$ \implies$ Con(ZFC+I0)''. …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
372 views

Singular Jonsson cardinals

Is the following consistent? $(*)$: There exists a singular cardinal $\kappa$ such that : (1) $\kappa$ is a Jonsson cardinal, (2) $\kappa$ is not a fixed point of the $\aleph-$function, i.e., $\kappa …
3 votes
Accepted

The axiom $I_0$ in the absence of $AC$

It is consistent that $AC$ fails and there exists a non-trivial elementary embedding $j: L(V_{\lambda+1}) \to L(V_{\lambda+1})$ with $crit(j) < \lambda,$ and $\lambda$ has uncountable cofinality. See …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
717 views

The axiom $I_0$ in the absence of $AC$

It is well-known that if $AC$ holds and if $j: L(V_{\lambda+1}) \to L(V_{\lambda+1})$ is a non-trivial elementary embedding with $crit(j) < \lambda,$ then $\lambda$ has countable cofinality (and in fa …

1
2 3 4 5
8
15 30 50 per page