Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with soft-question
Search options not deleted
user 102946
Questions that are about research in mathematics, or about the job of a research mathematician, without being mathematical problems or statements in the strictest sense. Do not use this tag for easy or supposedly easy mathematical questions.
3
votes
Accepted
Highly flexible PhD programs/school (with individual freedom)
This is not really an answer, but an extended comment.
I am repsonding to the following remarks of the OP:
"I'd also be interested in names of PhD advisors in the domain of analysis/data science/to …
- 12.5k
33
votes
Accepted
How do mathematicians find coauthors?
Alright, I'll try to outline several ways of how mathematicians find co-authors (since I'm still quite young, I lack the experience to judge how things might change later during a career, but given th …
21
votes
How to write math well?
Hmm, I'm about twelve years late to the party - anyway, since the post has just popped up at the front page, here's a list of suggestions that I try to follow when writing mathematics, mainly because …
15
votes
How about a statement without proof?
For this answer I assume that the proof of the result is non-trivial and "novel" in the sense that there is more to it than just repeating a proof of a very similar statement somewhere else.
While I d …
- 12.5k
21
votes
a claim for a proof of the invariant subspace problem
No, the proof is wrong.
Conceptual reason why it can't be correct:
The argument in the paper, were it correct, would actually show much more, namely that for every bounded linear operator $T$ on a sep …
- 12.5k