Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3 votes
0 answers
174 views

What are non-archimedean norms on $\mathbb{R}$, whose restriction to $\mathbb{Q}$ is trivial?

I wonder if there is any classification result on non-archimedean norms on $\mathbb{R}$, with trivial restriction to $\mathbb{Q}$? Any references or examples would be welcomed! Some examples of such ...
Mathstudent's user avatar
16 votes
2 answers
943 views

Higher-rank Archimedean valuations of $\mathbb{Q}$, does it exist?

I was reading the proof of Ostrowski's theorem, with an eye toward the Zariski-Riemann space (as well as adic space, Berkovich space, etc.) In the proof, the value group is always assumed to be in $\...
zxx's user avatar
  • 343
4 votes
1 answer
256 views

What is the definable functor associated to an algebraic scheme (model theory of valued fields)

I have a very basic question regarding algebraic model theory. I am trying to read Espaces de Berkovich, polytopes, squelettes et théorie des modèles (MSN) by Antoine Ducros. The relevant section is ...
Jakob Werner's user avatar
  • 1,153
2 votes
1 answer
139 views

Definition of model functions and their density in $C^0(X^\text{an})$

I am (still) working through the paper Singular semipositive metrics in non-Archimedean geometry by Sebastien Boucksom, Charles Favre and Mattias Jonsson (J. Algebraic Geom. 25 (2016), 77-139, doi:10....
Riquelme's user avatar
  • 155