Questions tagged [stirling-numbers]
The stirling-numbers tag has no usage guidance.
63 questions
0
votes
2
answers
187
views
Combinatorial Interpretation of Generalized Stirling numbers
I know the combinatorial interpretation of first, and second order Stirling numbers (#of k cycles of n items, and #of partitions n items into k subsets). Is there an interpretation for the generalized ...
9
votes
1
answer
568
views
Is this a new formula? $\Delta^d x^n/d! = \sum_k \left[ x \atop k\right]{ k+n \brace x + d}(-1)^{x+k}$
$$\frac{\Delta^d x^n}{d!} = \sum_k \left[ x \atop k\right]{ k+n \brace x + d}(-1)^{x+k}$$
Where $x$, $n$ and $d$ are non-negative integers, $\Delta^d$ is the $d$-th difference with respect to $x$, $\...
2
votes
1
answer
338
views
Simple approximation to a sum involving Stirling numbers?
I have also posted this question at https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/486917/simple-approximation-to-a-sum-involving-stirling-numbers. I have an exact answer to a problem, which is the function:...
2
votes
3
answers
529
views
How this expression leads to the given sequence
Here given is a sequence from OEIS.
The sequence is triangle of coefficients from fractional iteration of $e^x - 1$. Few terms are:
1, 1, 3, 1, 13, 18, 1, 50, 205, 180, 1, 201, 1865, 4245, 2700, 1, ...
4
votes
1
answer
385
views
Relations involving Stirling numbers of second kind
While inverting a Laplace transform using Post's inversion formula I found the following expression:
$$
\sum_{k=1}^n S^n_k \ x^k(\alpha)_k
$$
where $S^n_k$ is a Stirling number of second kind and $(\...
0
votes
1
answer
194
views
Asymptotic formula for an expression in terms of the second kind of stirling numbers
We have proved that
the limit of $\sum_{k=0}^n r^2k^m / (1+r)^{k+1}$ when n approaches infinity is $\sum_{k=1}^m S(m,k)k!/r^{k-1}$
where S(m,k) is the second kind of stirling number.
Is there a ...
9
votes
1
answer
825
views
An infinite set of identities using Stirling numbers 1st kind - are they all zero?
I have the following set of series involving the Stirling numbers 1'st kind and binomials, which can be understood as a set of dot-products of row- and column-vectors of two infinite matrices (where R ...
5
votes
1
answer
585
views
Alternating sums of alternate Stirling numbers
Does anybody know of any identities or combinatorial interpretations for alternating sums of alternate Stirling numbers?
I am particularly interested in expressions of the form:
$$\pm\sum_{k}(-1)^k|...
5
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Acyclic orientations of complete graphs in terms of Stirling numbers?
It is well-known that the number of acyclic orientations of $K_n$ is $n!$. Does anybody know of a combinatorial argument for this fact which uses the identity:
$$n!=\sum_{k=1}^ns(n,k),$$
where the $...
29
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Stirling number identity via homology?
This is a question about the well-known formula involving both types of Stirling numbers:
$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{k}S(n,k)c(k,m)=0$,
where $S(n,k)$ is the number of partitions of an $n$-element set ...
4
votes
0
answers
578
views
A combinatorial bound involving Stirling numbers of the second type
My previous question was solved in a very elegant way, hopefully this (seemingly more complicated) case is also easy for experts.
I need the inequality
$\Big(\prod^r_{i=1}p_i\Big)\sum^n_{j=0}(-1)^j\...
4
votes
1
answer
886
views
A bound involving Stirling numbers of the second kind and the asymptotics
Let $S_{n,r}$ denote the Stirling number of the second kind. Define $A_{n,r}:=\frac{\binom{n+r-1}{n}(n+r)!}{S_{n+r,r}r!}$. I want to prove:
$A_{n,1}\ge A_{n,2}\ge..\ge A_{n,r}\ge \lim_{r\to\infty} ...
13
votes
4
answers
3k
views
Simple/efficient representation of Stirling numbers of the first kind
Stirling numbers of the second kind can be expressed by means of a simple hypergeometric (considering $n$ fixed) sum
$$S_2(n,k) = \frac{1}{k!}\sum_{j=0}^{k}(-1)^{k-j}{k \choose j} j^n. \qquad (1)$$
...