Skip to main content

All Questions

5 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
5 votes
0 answers
336 views

Do 'change of coefficients' functors for sheaves commute with the four functors (formalism)?

For a morphism $f$ of varieties over a field of characteristic $\neq l$ I can consider the functors $Rf_*$, $f^\ast$, $f_!$, and $f^!$ both for the corresponding derived categories of 'all' (...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
432 views

Reference request: sheaf-theoretic operations in the classical topology?

Like many graduate students before trying to learn something about étale cohomology and Deligne's proof(s) of the Riemann hypothesis part of the Weil conjectures, I am hunting for references detailing ...
Student's user avatar
  • 273
2 votes
0 answers
358 views

What are the easiest cases of base change (for sheaves on sites)?

I have a closed embedding of schemes $i:X'\to X$, and for each of them I consider three Grothendieck topologies for the category of the corresponding (relatively) \'etale schemes: the \'etale one, the ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
414 views

Do inverse images respect flabby sheaves?

Let $i:Y\to X$ be a closed embedding of varieties, and let $S$ be a flabby \'etale (or Nisnevich) sheaf of abelian groups on $X$. Is $i^*S$ flabby also? I am mostly interested in the case when $S=i_{x*...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
249 views

On inverse images with respect to Zariski-etale topology.

For a variety $X$ I define its Zariski-etale site as follows: the category is the category of etale $X$-schemes, and the coverings are Zariski ones. Note that this topology is more coarse than the ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar