Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
81 views

How strong is separation + reflection without transitivity?

Consider a theory $T$ with a binary relation $\in$ and the following axiom schemas: $\exists u \forall x (x \in u \leftrightarrow x \in a \land \phi)$ where $u$ is not free in $\phi$. This is the ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
14 votes
0 answers
391 views

Can the axiom of choice be expressed in 4 quantifiers?

This 2007 paper presents a 5-quantifier $(\in, =)$-expression that is ZF-equivalent to the axiom of choice, but leaves open the 4-quantifier case: Thus the gap is reduced to the undecided case of a 4 ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
12 votes
1 answer
227 views

Is there a $\Pi_2$ sentence $A$ such that $\text{ZFC}^- + A$ proves powerset?

This is a follow-up to this question. Let $\text{ZFC}^-$ be ZFC without powerset and with collection rather than replacement, as described here. Is there a $\Pi_2$ (or perhaps $\Sigma_2$) sentence $A$ ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
4 votes
1 answer
369 views

Bounded alternatives to powerset that interpret ZFC

In set theory, many properties/relations of interest can be expressed as $\Delta_0$ formulas (formulas with only bounded quantifiers): \begin{align} \text{empty}(a) &\equiv \forall x \in a . \...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
3 votes
1 answer
510 views

Harvey Friedman: The expanding mind

In reference 1, Friedman writes: I discuss my efforts concerning 3 crucial issues in the foundations of mathematics that are deeply connected with the great work of Kurt Gödel. [...] B. Are there ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
6 votes
1 answer
205 views

How strong is separation + reflection of unbounded quantifiers?

Consider a set theory with the following axioms: separation: $\exists y \forall x (x \in y \leftrightarrow \phi \land x \in a)$ where $y$ is not free in $\phi$ reflection: $\phi \to \exists u \phi^u$ ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
1 vote
0 answers
123 views

Is $\sf \Gamma_0$ the proof theoretic ordinal of this kind of predicative class theory?

Adopting the approach of Mono-sorted $\sf NBG$, define sets as elements of classes, then axiomatize: Extensionality, Predicative Class comprehension, emptyset, in the usual manner along mono-sorted $\...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
588 views

Consistency strength of an attempt at higher order set theory

Work in a theory with (deep breath) a countable number of primitives denoted with capital letters from the end of the alphabet with numerical subscripts $\{X_n,Y_n,Z_n,\dots\}_{n<\omega}$ ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.1k
12 votes
0 answers
574 views

Harvey Friedman's minimalist axioms for set theory

[This is a question on the FOM mailing list.] In 1997, Harvey Friedman introduced the following theory: Let $\in$ be a binary predicate and $U$ be a constant. Add the following axioms: Subworld ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
1 vote
0 answers
192 views

Does foundationless Ackermann set theory prove replacement?

From Ackermann's set theory equals ZF (1970) by William N. Reinhardt: Let A be the theory determined by the following axioms: Extensionality: $\forall z (z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in y) \to x = y$ ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
5 votes
2 answers
629 views

Applications of ZFA-Set Theory

The set theory with atoms (ZFA), is a modified version of set theory, and is characterized by the fact that it admits objects other than sets, atoms. Atoms are objects which do not have any elements. ...
Yes's user avatar
  • 115
3 votes
2 answers
720 views

Shortest axiom of infinity for foundationless set theory

Let $T$ be the theory with a binary symbol $\in$, an unary symbol $S$, and the following axioms: Axiom of extension: \begin{equation} \forall x \forall y (\forall z (z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
55 votes
10 answers
11k views

How should a "working mathematician" think about sets? (ZFC, category theory, urelements)

Note that "a working mathematician" is probably not the best choice of words, it's supposed to mean "someone who needs the theory for applications rather than for its own sake". Think about it as a ...
Jxt921's user avatar
  • 1,115
-3 votes
1 answer
262 views

An axiomatic system with a set of constants that form a complete ordered field [closed]

I am developing a ZFC axiomatic system where together with the empty set, there is a singular (and huge) set of constants that are themselves sets and form a complete ordered field (cof) these ...
Carlos Freites's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
191 views

Class theory with support for self-application of class functions?

To every natural number $n$, we can assign its Church numeral $\underline{n}.$ A formal definition would be: $\underline{0}(f)=\mathrm{id}_{\mathrm{dom}(f)}$ $\underline{n+1}(f) = \underline{n}...
goblin GONE's user avatar
  • 3,793
4 votes
2 answers
452 views

On wild behavior of $\omega_{1}$ in the absence of some essential axioms of $ZFC$

The regularity of $\omega_{1}$ is one of the most well known facts of set theory. But it seems that in order to prove this simple fact we need the "full power" of mathematics! For example by an ...
user avatar