All Questions
49 questions
5
votes
1
answer
468
views
Any "motive"(-like) theory which can catch that cusp $y^2=x^3$ (and similar) are non-trivial?
Consider cusp $y^2=x^3$ which can also be described as $k[z]~without~z$ , taking $x=z^3,y=z^2$.
Algebraically its $Spec$ is quite different from $k$. For example:
it has plenty non-trivial "line-...
13
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Who proved the motivic 6-functor formalism?
In the recent beautiful talk "Motives and ring stacks" Peter Scholze states the theorem saying that there exists an initial 6-functor formalism on $\mathit{Sch}_\mathbb{Z}$ such that
when $...
3
votes
0
answers
206
views
Generalization of conjectures involving Beilinson regulators
I had some questions about the Beilinson conjectures as mentioned in this page. I have to admit I do not know much about Deligne cohomology. The conjectures involve some form of comparison map between ...
4
votes
1
answer
238
views
Functoriality conjectures on the slice filtration
Voevodsky wrote on his paper "Open Problems in the Motivic Stable Homotopy Theory, I" that
Three other groups of conjectures in motivic homotopy theory, not included in to this paper, seem ...
1
vote
0
answers
213
views
Algebraic correspondence as morphisms in Betti cohomology
$\newcommand{\sing}{\mathrm{sing}}$Take a commutative ring $R$ and smooth projective complex varieties $X$ and $Y$. An element $\alpha\in CH^*(X\times Y)_R$ induces the algebraic correspondence for ...
1
vote
0
answers
260
views
Non-examples of mixed Tate motives
I was trying to find examples of schemes (preferably smooth) over $\mathbb{C}$ which have motives that aren't mixed Tate. I wasn't able to come up with anything or find an argument that's been written ...
8
votes
0
answers
587
views
Values of cohomology theory on a point
$\DeclareMathOperator\Sm{Sm}$It is a well-known fact that in algebraic topology, generalized cohomology theories are determined by their values on the point. I was wondering whether anything similar ...
26
votes
1
answer
1k
views
What's motivic about $\mathbb{A}^1$-homotopy theory? What's motivic about correspondences?
I come today to mathoverflow to showcase some genuine confusion about the motivic world. I want to ask some questions before actually starting to study the subject, to build some sense of direction.
I ...
3
votes
1
answer
477
views
Arc space & formal loops in motivic integration
One of the most essential ingredients in the theory of motivic integration are the space of arcs of a given $k$-variety
$X$. This is a scheme, whose $k$-rational points are the $k[[t]]$-valued points ...
1
vote
1
answer
245
views
Pseudo-Abelian Completion in the constrution of Motifs (by Y. Manin)
I reading Yuri Manin's famous paper on "CORRESPONDENCES, MOTIFS AND MONOIDAL TRANSFORMATIONS" and struggle with his definition for so called pseudo-abelian completion given on page 453 by a reason I ...
7
votes
1
answer
552
views
Motivation for Suslin’s Rigidity Conjecture
Suslin Rigidity conjecture states that motivic cohomology
$$
H_{\mathcal{M}}^1(\operatorname{Spec}(F),\mathbb{Q}(n))
$$
of the field $F$ coincides with motivic cohomology for the subfield of ...
10
votes
2
answers
534
views
A question about the vanishing of motivic cohomology in negative Tate twist
Let $DM_{\text{gm}}$ be the category of Voevodsky´s geometric motives. Let $p,q\in \mathbb{Z}$ be integers with $p<0$.
Is it true that
$$\text{Hom}_{DM_{\text{gm}}}(M_{\text{gm}}(X),\mathbb{Z}(p)[...
21
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Spectral sequences in $K$-theory
There is an algebraic analogue of the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence from singular cohomology to topological $K$-theory of a topological space.
For a field $k$, let $X$ be smooth variety $X$ ...
9
votes
1
answer
643
views
Torsion in Deligne cohomology
Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex analytic space, $i,p\ge 0$ integers, $\mathbf{Z}(p)_{\mathcal{D}}$ the Deligne complex of $X$, $H^i_{\mathcal{D}}(X,\mathbf{Z}(p))$ its hypercohomology.
What ...
8
votes
0
answers
574
views
Reference request: Motivic Cohomology and Cycle class maps
For a smooth projective variety $X$ over any field $K$, Voevodsky showed in his paper ``Motivic Cohomology Groups Are Isomorphic to Higher Chow Groups in Any Characteristic" that the motivic ...
14
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Is Deligne cohomology the motivic cohomology of analytic spaces?
Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex analytic space.
We can cook up a complex analytic version of Bloch's cycle complex by declaring
$z^n(X^{\rm an}, m)$
is the free abelian group on all ...
5
votes
1
answer
426
views
Blowup formula for motivic cohomology
If $X$ is a smooth projective variety over a field, $Z\subset X$ a smooth closed subvariety of codimension $d$, $X'\to X$ the blowup of $X$ along $Z$, there's the blowup formula
$$H^j(X'_{et},\mathbf{...
7
votes
1
answer
689
views
Two motivic complexes, compared
Bloch defines the motivic complexes $\mathbf{Z}(n)$ in his paper "Algebraic Cycles and Higher K-Theory" (1986).
Some references (that I currently am unable to track down) use $$\check{\mathbf{Z}}(n) :...
4
votes
0
answers
205
views
$\mathbf{A}^1$- contractibility
Suppose $U$ is an $\mathbf{A}^1$-contractible smooth scheme over a field $k$, that is, it is isomorphic to a point in the $\mathbf{A}^1$-homotopy category of smooth schemes over $k$.
Does motivic ...
11
votes
1
answer
967
views
How to think about infinite generatedness of motivic cohomology
In this question I previously asked how to think about the motivic complex $\mathbf{Z}(1)_{\mathcal{M}}$, whose Zariski hypercohomology should morally be the "singular cohomology" $H^*((-)\wedge S^{2n}...
8
votes
1
answer
989
views
How to think about $\mathbf{Z}(n)_{\mathcal{M}}$
One definition of motivic cohomology for smooth schemes $X$ over a field, is via Friedlander-Suslin complexes.
A refresher (you may skip to the question at the bottom)
One defines
(1) $z_n(X,d) :=$...
5
votes
1
answer
482
views
Around algebraic equivalence of cycles
Let $k$ be a finitely generated field, $X$ a smooth projective $k$-variety, $\ell$ a prime number, $\ell\in k^{\times}$, $r\ge 0$ an integer.
The Tate conjecture asserts surjectivity of the cycle ...
9
votes
0
answers
463
views
Beilinson regulators and Bloch's mythological algebraic intermediate Jacobians
In the paper introducing his motivic cycle complexes, Bloch outlines a project he says he was going to return to in the future:
Towards the end of page 270, he says, given a smooth projective variety ...
12
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Motivic vs Deligne cohomology
Where can I find the construction of the cycle class map from motivic cohomology to Deligne cohomology of smooth projective varieties over the complex numbers?
It should be a construction by Bloch ...
5
votes
0
answers
513
views
Poincaré duality for motivic cohomology
Is Poincaré duality for étale motivic cohomology known for projective regular (not necessarily smooth, just regular) schemes over Dedekind rings?
More precisely, two questions. Let $f: \mathcal{X}\to\...
7
votes
1
answer
710
views
A question on Voevodsky´s categories
I want to try to understand the Voevodsky´s big triangulated categories of motives $DM$ and $DM^{eff}$. Unfortunately, I am being not able to find answers to the following, too vague, questions:
1.- ...
71
votes
1
answer
8k
views
What is the relationship between motivic cohomology and the theory of motives?
I will begin by giving a rough sketch of my understanding of motives.
In many expositions about motives (for example, http://www.jmilne.org/math/xnotes/MOT102.pdf), the category of motives is defined ...
4
votes
0
answers
244
views
Effectivity and Lower Shriek for Voevodsky Motives
I am in a situation where I need a result of the following form. Suppose $X$ is a smooth $k$-variety, $U$ is a dense open subvariety with complement $Z$ a smooth divisor. Let $\pi^X:X\rightarrow\text{...
6
votes
0
answers
400
views
Hodge Realisation of Mixed Tate Motives
For a field $k$ which satisfies Beilinson-Soule vanishing conjecture, the from Levine's paper,
https://www.uni-due.de/~bm0032/publ/TateMotives.pdf
There exists an abelian category of mixed Tate ...
4
votes
1
answer
182
views
Explicit description of Verdier quotient of effective motives
Let $DM^{eff}_{gm}(k)$ be the triangulated category of effective geometric motives over some field $k$ (in the sense of Voevodsky), and let $DM^{eff}_{gm}(k)(1)$ be its full triangulated subcategory ...
2
votes
1
answer
367
views
Dualizability and motivic cohomology
Suppose $k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p$. Let $A=\mathbb{Z}/\ell\mathbb{Z}$, $\ell$ a prime coprime to $p$. Denote by $MA$ the motivic Eilenberg-Maclane spectrum over $k$. Is ...
17
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Why presheaves with transfer?
Presheaves with transfer are a main technical ingredient in Voevodsky's construction of his category of mixed motives. From the perspective of motivic homotopy theory, the only difference between SH ...
12
votes
0
answers
726
views
What is missing in the current constructions of pure and mixed motives?
Yo! Maybe this question is too broad, so maybe it should be community wiki? In summary, I want to known all the known comparisons between all the constructions of pure and mixed motives and what make ...
18
votes
4
answers
2k
views
Applications of homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky
One of the most important theorems in motivic homotopy theory is the homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky which says that the motivic Thom space of the normal bundle $\mathcal N_{Z/X}$ of a ...
7
votes
1
answer
920
views
Intuition behind the definition of finite correspondences
Finite correspondences were introduced by Suslin-Voevodsky (if I am not wrong) to define motivic complexes that compute motivic cohomology. Let $X$ and be smooth separated schemes of finite type over ...
6
votes
0
answers
351
views
Correspondences of schemes induced by a finite Galois extension
I am trying to do the first exercises of the Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel book Lecture Notes on Motivic Cohomology, which are some elementary results about correspondences between schemes.
Recall that if $...
11
votes
1
answer
917
views
Motivic cohomology and pushforward maps
I have a question about pushforward maps for the motivic cohomology groups $H^p(X, \mathbf{Q}(q))$, for $X$ a smooth variety over a characteristic 0 field.
According to Mazza--Voevodsky--Weibel "...
1
vote
0
answers
179
views
Which "concrete" morphisms of varieties and motives induce bijections of their lower Chow groups?
This question is a continuation of Varieties with Chow groups supported in positive codimension: examples and properties?
What examples are known of morphisms of varieties and Chow motives (say, over ...
0
votes
0
answers
288
views
What can one say about zero-cycle groups for products of Chow motives
What can one say about the Chow group of zero-cycles (up to rational equivalence) for a product of smooth projective varieties and Chow motives (so, I am interested in the kernel $Chow_0(P)\otimes ...
10
votes
1
answer
743
views
Stable motivic cohomology with finite coefficients?
In this question, which attracted no responces so far, I've asked whether it is possible to extend the Beilinson-Lichtenbaum etale descent rule for motivic cohomology to singular varieties, in ...
4
votes
1
answer
912
views
Standard conjectures on positive characteristic
In this MO answer of M. Bondarko, he says:
"the Hodge conjecture implies all the Grothendieck's standard conjectures over base fields of characteristic 0..."
and in Remarks on Grothendieck's ...
1
vote
0
answers
176
views
Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology and Universal cohomology theory? [duplicate]
Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology (Beilinson, Lichtenbaum and Voevodsky) and Universal cohomology theory (Grothendieck)?
8
votes
1
answer
467
views
Known norm varieties and the Bloch-Kato conjecture
The Bloch-Kato conjecture states that
$K_M^n(k)/l \simeq H^n(k,\mu^{\otimes n}_l)$ for every $n,l$,while $l$ is invertible in $k$.
A important part in the proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture is to ...
5
votes
0
answers
801
views
Two questions on motivic homotopy theory
I am a beginner in motivic homotopy theory and motivic cohomology and have just begun reading books by Dundas et al. and Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel. I have two basic questions:
Why is the question of $\...
1
vote
1
answer
266
views
Definition of Hurewicz map relating $SH(k)$ with $DM_\_^{eff}(k)$
In "Motivic Homotopy Theory" on page 153 it is stated that there exists a canonical Hurewicz map relating the motivic stable homotopy category with the category $\operatorname{DM}_\_^{eff}(k)$. ...
2
votes
0
answers
326
views
Voevodsky's 'split standard triple' argument: an explanation; does it work with $Z/nZ$-coefficients?
For varieties over a perfect field (of some characteristic $p$ that could be 0) Voevodsky defines the notion of a 'standard triple' (see http://books.google.ru/books?id=TzUmk87bN9cC&pg=PA85&...
14
votes
1
answer
746
views
Can there exist Chow motives/motivic cohomology for compact Kähler manifolds?
Can there exist a 'reasonable' extension of the (higher) Chow groups of complex smooth projective algebraic varieties to functors on the category of compact Kähler manifolds? Are there any ...
3
votes
0
answers
638
views
Weak Lefschetz for torsion motivic cohomology (or torsion Chow groups)?
I am trying to prove the following Weak-Lefschetz-type statement for motivic cohomology: if $Z$ is a smooth hyperplane section of a smooth projective $X$ of dimension $d$ (say, over the field of ...
2
votes
1
answer
589
views
Are finite correspondances flat?
In Voevodsky&Mazza&Weibel's book on motivic cohomology they define "an elementary correspondance from X (Smooth connected scheme over $k$) to Y (separated scheme over $k$) as an irreducible ...