Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
6 votes
1 answer
290 views

Subset of the reals with zero inner measure and "full" outer measure in $\mathsf{ZF}+\mathsf{DC}$

Working in $\mathsf{ZF}+\mathsf{DC}$ (that is, we are allowed to use Dependent Choice but not full choice), suppose that there exists a non-measurable subset of the unit interval $[0,1]$ (just non-...
David Fernandez-Breton's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
258 views

What is the measure of two sets which partition the reals into subsets of positive measure?

This is a follow up to this question, where I wish to partition the reals into two sets $A$ and $B$ that are dense (with positive measure) in every non-empty sub-interval $(a,b)$ of $\mathbb{R}$. (In ...
Arbuja's user avatar
  • 63
4 votes
1 answer
351 views

$\sigma$-algebra generated by analytic sets

The Borel $\sigma$-algebra $\cal B$ on real numbers has many good properties. For instance, all continuous functions are $\cal B/\cal B$-measurable. On the other side, not only $\cal B$ is not ...
Giafazio's user avatar
  • 205
15 votes
2 answers
530 views

Nontrivial signed measure on Lebesgue measurable sets being trivial on Borel sets

Let $\mathfrak{L}(\mathbb{R})$ be the collection of Lebesgue measurable sets and $\mathfrak{B}(\mathbb{R})$ be the Borel sets. Question: Is there a nontrivial signed measure on $\mathfrak{L}(\mathbb{R}...
Zhang Yuhan's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
596 views

On the existence of a family of countably additive extensions of Lebesgue measure

Let $m$ be Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb R$, and let $m_i$ and $m_o$ be the inner and outer measures respectively. Is it the case that for all $A \subset \mathbb R$ and all $x \in [m_i(A), m_o(A)]$ ...
aduh's user avatar
  • 869
10 votes
1 answer
326 views

Partition into sets of positive outer measure

Let $\mu^{\star}$ denote Lebesgue outer measure. Suppose $X \subseteq [0, 1]$ and $\mu^{\star}(X) > 0$. Can we divide $X$ into uncountably many sets $\{X_i : i \in I\}$ such that for every $i \in I$...
Lebesgue's user avatar
  • 121
15 votes
1 answer
572 views

Does the existence of a non-principal measure on ω imply that of a non Lebesgue measurable set?

A non-principal [probability] measure on a set X is a function $\mu$ defined on all subsets of $X$, with values in $[0,1]$, which is finitely additive, satisfies $\mu(X)=1$, and vanishes on singletons....
Jean-Claude Sikorav's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
3k views

Axiom of choice and non-measurable set

We know that existence of a Lebesgue non-measurable set follows from the Axiom Of Choice. Is the converse true? That is, does the existence of a Lebesgue non-measurable set imply the Axiom Of Choice?...
Prashant Singh's user avatar