Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
18 votes
3 answers
2k views

Taking a proper class as a model for Set Theory

When I am reading through higher Set Theory books I am frequently met with statements such as '$V$ is a model of ZFC' or '$L$ is a model of ZFC' where $V$ is the Von Neumann Universe, and $L$ the ...
Elie Ben-Shlomo's user avatar
17 votes
3 answers
1k views

Minimum transitive models and V=L

Is there a c.e. theory $T⊢\text{ZFC}$ in the language of set theory such that the minimum transitive model of $T$ exists but does not satisfy $V=L$? You may assume that ZFC has transitive models. ...
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
222 views

Does $\mathit{Aut}(\mathbb{R};+)$ have a copy in $L(\mathbb{R})$ granting large cardinals?

Throughout, work in $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + large cardinals (let's say a proper class of Woodin limits of Woodins but I'm happy to go higher if that would help). Let $\mathcal{R}=(\mathbb{R};+)$ be the ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
314 views

Is there a "nice" inner model for $\mathsf{ZF}$ + a Dedekind-finite infinite set of reals?

Below, given a formula $\varphi$ which $\mathsf{ZF}$ proves defines a set of reals and an inner model $W$, I'll write "$\varphi^W$" and "$L(\varphi^W)$" for "$\{x:W\models\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
192 views

"Very $L$-like" models, part 1: large cardinals

(The original version of this question was much narrower and less natural; but see the edit history if interested.) Say that a good logic is a regular logic $\mathcal{L}$ containing $\mathsf{FOL}$ ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
325 views

If we have a class like $L$ but allowing a set number of unbounded quantifiers, is it strict superset of $L$?

The definition of $L$ only permits bounded quantifiers. If we allow a certain number of unbounded quantifiers, does this result in a strict superset of $L$? For example: $$ \operatorname{Def}^{\...
Christopher King's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
152 views

Why are the sharps of sets of big ordinals not in $\mathcal{P}(\omega)$?

In his talk A Condensed History of Condensation, Welch presents the following recursive sharp function, that is total when all sharps exist: \begin{align*} \# \colon ON &\to \mathcal{P}(ON) \\ \...
Martín S's user avatar
  • 421
2 votes
0 answers
195 views

"Very $L$-like" models, part 2: combinatorics

Say that a good logic is a regular logic $\mathcal{L}$ containing $\mathsf{FOL}$ and having the finite use property and the strong downward Lowenheim-Skolem property together with, for each finite ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar