Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
12 votes
1 answer
986 views

Why is Heegaard Floer Homology defined in terms of Sym$^g\Sigma_g$ instead of Pic$^g\Sigma_g$?

Recall the definition of Heegaard Floer homology: $\Sigma_g$ is a closed surface, and $\{\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_g\}$ and $\{\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_g\}$ are sets of attaching circles. Then Heegaard ...
John Pardon's user avatar
  • 18.7k
6 votes
1 answer
602 views

Path of almost complex structure in the definition of Heegaard Floer homology

$\DeclareMathOperator\Sym{Sym}$In order to define Heegaard Floer Homology for a connected, closed, oriented 3 manifold, we fix a generic path of nearly symmetric almost complex structure $J_s$ over $\...
Ilknur 's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
225 views

Is Heegaard-Floer homology the Lagrangian Floer homology of $M=\text{Sym}^g(\Sigma), L_0=\mathbb{T}_{\alpha},L_1=\mathbb{T}_{\beta}$?

Is Heegaard Floer homology the Lagrangian Floer homology of $M=\text{Sym}^g(\Sigma), L_0=\mathbb{T}_{\alpha},L_1=\mathbb{T}_{\beta}$? I am interested in the relationship between the theories ...
contingent's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
1k views

Heegard diagrams for three-manifolds

I have a basic question about the Heegaard diagrams involved in providing a framework for calculation of Floer-Homology of three-manifolds. Typically such diagrams look like Figure 1 and Figure 2 here ...
user267839's user avatar
  • 5,986
3 votes
1 answer
223 views

Algebraic variations of the full knot Floer complex

In Hom's paper (arXiv link), p.20, Section 3.3 ends with "There are other algebraic modifications one may consider, such as setting $U^n = 0$ or $UV = 0$", referring to the knot Floer ...
horned-sphere's user avatar