8
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a one-relator group $\langle A \mid R = 1 \rangle$. Then clearly $G$ is finite if and only if it is cyclic of finite order, i.e. can be given by a presentation $\langle a \mid a^n = 1 \rangle$ for some $n > 0$.

1. What are the finite two-relator groups?

This question might be unanswerable. An indication of why this problem might be difficult comes from a classical example due to Dehn. He shows that for any $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $m \in \{ 2, 3, 4, 5\}$, the group $$ G_{m,n} = \langle a,b \mid a^2 = b^3, \: (ab)^m b^{3n} = 1 \rangle $$ is finite, i.e. a quotient of the trefoil knot group. Indeed, he shows that these groups fit in short exact sequences $$ 1 \longrightarrow C_k \longrightarrow G_{m,n} \longrightarrow H_m \longrightarrow 1 $$ where $k \in \{ 3n + 5, 4n + 10, 6n + 20, 12n + 50 \}$ and $H_m \in \{ S_3, A_4, S_4, A_5 \}$ depending on the value of $m$ (indexed as above). Thus the question is already quite non-trivial even when one of the relators is rather simple. A partial and valuable answer to Question 1 would hence be an answer to the following question:

2. What are the finite (relative) one-relator quotients of the trefoil knot group $\langle a, b \mid a^2 = b^3 \rangle$?

In particular, is $G_{m,n}$ finite for any $m>5$ and $n > 0$? (I suspect not). Any thoughts would be welcome!

$\endgroup$
16
  • $\begingroup$ You don't need Freiheisatz for the 1st statement: it is clear that a 1-relator group on $\ge 2$ generators has infinite abelianization. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Sep 23 at 5:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I googled « "balanced presentations" "finite groups"». $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Sep 23 at 5:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For the special case of Question 2, you should look again at Dehn’s paper. He exhibits infinitely many “Dehn fillings” (as they are now known) that act cocompactly on the hyperbolic plane. So unless your parametrisation in terms of $m,n$ is very different from his, the answer should be “no”. $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    Commented Sep 23 at 6:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The Dehn paper is: Dehn, M. Über die Topologie des dreidimensionalen Raumes. Math. Ann. 69 (1910), no. 1, 137–168. I suspect your German is better than mine, but in case not there is, as usual, an excellent English translation in Stillwell's book of Dehn's paper on topology. $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    Commented Sep 23 at 7:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DenisT I don’t understand what you mean. The word problem of any finite group is a regular language. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 23 at 9:48

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

Question 1:

As mentioned in comments, presentations with the same number of generators and relations are called balanced. The triviality problem for balanced presentations appears to be a question of Magnus (see Ian Leary's comment below, cf. Question 13.9 on Bestvina's problem list).

It is in a similar vein to the more famous Andrews--Curtis conjecture and, just like Andrews--Curtis, is wide open. Relaxing "triviality" to "finiteness" and restricting to two relations isn't going to help, so I feel confident in claiming that Question 1 (in the sense of algorithmic decidability) is an open problem.

Question 2:

Again, I doubt there is a reasonable full description.

Edit: apologies, my earlier answer was a little glib here, although I think the spirit -- there's unlikely to be a satisfying classification -- is correct.

Groups of this form are central extensions of generalised triangle groups in the sense of

Baumslag, Morgan, Shalen, Generalized triangle groups. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 102 (1987), no. 1, 25–31.

There's a disparate literature on this subject, but I'd be very surprised if it is completely understood which ones are finite. (This feels in a similar vein to the isomorphism problem for one-relator groups, say.)

For your specific question about Dehn's family, note that

$G_{m,n}/\langle b^3\rangle\cong \langle a,b\mid a^2,b^3,(ab)^m\rangle$

which is the $(2,3,m)$-triangle group. In particular, $G_{m,n}$ is infinite whenever $m>5$ and $n>0$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Martin Bridson's formulation of the triviality question on Bestvina's problem list is a nice one, but the question already appeared in the 1965 version of the Kourovka Notebook as question 1.12 (asked by Greendlinger who attributed it to Magnus). $\endgroup$
    – IJL
    Commented Sep 24 at 13:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @IJL: That makes much more sense -- I'm delighted to learn it has a classical source! $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    Commented Sep 24 at 14:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .