0
$\begingroup$

For each positive integer $n$, let $p(n)$ be the number of partitions of $n$ (i.e., the number of ways to write $n$ as a sum of positive integers), and let $q(n)$ be the number of strict partitions of $n$ (i.e., the number of ways to write $n$ as a sum of distinct positive integers).The integer sequences $p(n)\ (n=1,2,3,\ldots)$ and $q(n)\ (n=1,2,3,\ldots)$ are available from http://oeis.org/A000041 and http://oeis.org/A000009, respectively. The famous Hardy-Ramanujan formula states that
$$p(n)\sim\frac{e^{\pi\sqrt{2n/3}}}{4\sqrt3}\qquad \ \text{as}\ \ n\to+\infty.$$ It is also known that $$q(n)\sim\frac{e^{\pi\sqrt{n/3}}}{4(3n^3)^{1/4}}\qquad \ \text{as}\ \ n\to+\infty.$$ Thus the two series $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1{p(n)}\quad\mbox{and}\quad \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1{q(n)}$$ converge.

Question. Are the numbers $$s=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1{p(n)}\quad\mbox{and}\quad t=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1{q(n)}$$ transcendental?

I conjecture that both $s$ and $t$ are transcendental numbers. Any way to prove this? If not, can one prove that $s$ and $t$ are irrational numbers?

Your comments are welcome!

$\endgroup$
13
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ I conjecture that every number that isn't obviously algebraic is transcendental. $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2023 at 0:32
  • $\begingroup$ Can you define "obviously algebraic" in a rigorous mathematical manner? $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2023 at 0:44
  • $\begingroup$ I consider the question interesting since both $p(n)$ and $q(n)$ grow slower than exponenetial functions but faster than polynomials. $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2023 at 0:51
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ A lot of sequences grow slower than exponential but faster than polynomial. $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2023 at 1:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can you define "natural" in a rigorous mathematical manner? $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2023 at 12:11

0

You must log in to answer this question.