7
$\begingroup$

When is $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p}})$ a Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$?

I was motivated by the question that $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}})$ is a Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$. Here is a rough sketch of the proof.

First, note that the polynomial $$f(x)=(x-\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}) (x+\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}})(x-\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}})(x+\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}})$$ is irreducible by the Eisenstein irreducibility criterion. So we claim that $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}})$ is the splitting field of the separable polynomial $f(x)$. It suffices to show that $\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}\in\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}})$. To do this, we first note that $5+\sqrt{5}$ and hence $\sqrt{5}$ is in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}})$.

Then, by noticing that $$\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}=\frac{\color{red}{\sqrt{5-1}}\sqrt{5}}{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}}= \frac{\color{red}2\sqrt{5}}{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}},\tag{1}$$

we see that $\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}$ is in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}})$ as desired.

By the above argument, we see that $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p}})$ is a Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ when $p-1$ is a square number. (The importance of $p-1$ being a square number can be seen from equation (1)-See the part highlighted in red)

I am wondering if this is both a necessary and sufficient criterion for $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p}})$ to be a Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$. In other words, $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p}})$ is a Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ if and only if $p$ is prime and $p-1$ is a square number.

Some things that I have noticed regarding this problem:

  1. $p=3$ doesn’t satisfy the suggested criterion and isn’t a Galois extension. See (https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4052247/showing-that-mathbbq-sqrt3-sqrt3-is-not-galois)

  2. For general a $p$, $f(x)=x^4-2px^2+(p^2-p)$.

  3. I am not sure if we need $p$ to be prime. The only place where we used $p$ is prime is when we used the Eisenstein irreducibility criterion. But do we really need $f(x)$ to be irreducible?

  4. This is where I am probably getting a bit ahead of myself. But when we say that $p-1$ is a square number, most of us naturally assume that $p$ is in $\mathbb{Z}^+$ and $p-1$ is square in $\mathbb{Z}^+$. But can we further generalise the result by allowing $p$ to be in $\mathbb{Q}$ and $p-1$ be square in $\mathbb{Q}$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ $p$ certainly does not need to be prime: e.g., the extension is Galois whenever $p$ is a square. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2022 at 6:07
  • $\begingroup$ @EmilJeřábek Oh yes! Can’t believe that I missed something so obvious. Was thinking of the case when $p=a^2b$, where $b$ is non-square. For example, $p=2^2\times 3$ $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2022 at 6:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Moreover, for the Eisenstein irreducibility criterion you only need $p$ to not be a powerful number. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2022 at 6:34

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

Note that $f$ cannot have an irreducible factor of degree $3$ since it is even, so if $f$ is reducible, it means that the minimal polynomial of $\sqrt{p+\sqrt{p}}$ has degree at most $2$, so your extension is automatically Galois in this case.

Hence we may assume without loss of generality that $f$ is irreducible.

Your question then may be rephrased as follows: when is the Galois group of $f=X^4-2pX^2+p^2-p$ is the Klein group or the cyclic group of order $4$ ?

The answer (and much more!) is given in Corollary 4.5. of this paper by Keith Conrad

Applied to your specific polynomial, the answer is : exactly when $p^2-p$ is a square (Klein group case) or when $p-1$ is a square (cyclic case).

Another link with a direct proof may be found here

$\endgroup$
3
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ But $p^2-p$ cannot be square, as it is divisible by $p$ but not $p^2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2022 at 9:45
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Take $p = 4/3$... (the criterion is valid for rational $p$ such that the polynomial is irreducible). $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2022 at 10:24
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ With $p = 4/3$, the polynomial is reducible, but $p = 9/5$ gives a Klein group example. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2022 at 10:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .