It seems to be a commonplace in harmonic analysis that if some operator (say, Fourier multiplier) is bounded on $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ then by transference the similar operator is also bounded on $L^p(\mathbb{T}^n)$ (the most common example of application of this general principle is Hilbert transform for $n=1$). There exist certain general theorems which allow us to transfer the results in the setting of $\mathbb{R}^n$ to the setting of $\mathbb{T}^n$, and vice versa (for example, such theorems may be found in Grafakos, "Classical Fourier Analysis").
Now, my question is -- can we do the same for the cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_n$ (with the standard Haar measure on it)? Say, for arbitrary number $m<n$ we may define the operator $\widehat{Tf}=\chi_{[0,m]}\hat{f}$ on $L^p(\mathbb{Z}_n)$. It seems to be not difficult to see directly that such operator is bounded and its norm does not depend on $n$ and $m$ but can we somehow derive it from the fact that Hilbert transform is bounded on $L^p(\mathbb{R})$ and $L^p(\mathbb{T})$? The intuition here is that for large $n$ the group $\mathbb{Z}_n$ should resemble $\mathbb{Z}$ (or $\mathbb{T}$) but I do not know how to do a rigorous proof of such "transference".
After that, one may go further and prove the "Littlewood--Paley theorem for $\mathbb{Z}_n$" (uniformly in $n$) and maybe certain multiplier theorems. Did anybody address such questions (with or without transference)? Or maybe these questions are trivial for some reason?