For real $s>0$, let $$S(s):=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty e^{-n^2/(2s^2)} =\vartheta _3\left(0,e^{-1/(2 s^2)}\right),$$ where $\vartheta$ is the elliptic theta function.

Plotting suggests that the identity \begin{equation} S(s)=s\sqrt{2\pi} \end{equation} is true at least for $s\ge3/2$. Is it indeed?

This conjecture, with a plot, appeared as a part of this answer, but seems to warrant separate posting. Mathematica cannot prove or disprove this identity.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ if it holds for $s \ge 3/2$, then it must hold for $s > 0$ (holomorphic extension). $\endgroup$ Jul 15, 2021 at 5:43
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ No, the equality you wrote doesn’t hold exactly, although it probably looks like it numerically because the error is exponentially small as $s\to \infty$, e.g. by Euler-Maclaurin or complex analysis (see math.stackexchange.com/questions/719401/…). $\endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jul 15, 2021 at 5:47
  • $\begingroup$ In Mathematica, With[{s=2},N[EllipticTheta[3,0,E^(-1/(2s^2))]/(s Sqrt[2Pi]),50]] gives the answer 1.0000000000000000000000000000000001024500455847086 $\endgroup$ Jul 15, 2021 at 6:22
  • $\begingroup$ To add to my comment, you can probably see the non-equality and understand the smallness of the error even more explicitly by using Poisson summation. $\endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jul 15, 2021 at 6:39
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you everyone for your comments. $\endgroup$ Jul 15, 2021 at 11:15

1 Answer 1


To give an answer, adding to my comments, your formula doesn’t hold true, although the error is exponentially small as $s\to \infty$, as can be seen by Poisson summing, which transforms your sum to $$\sqrt{2\pi}s\left(1+\mathcal{O}(e^{-2\pi^2 s^2})\right).$$

  • $\begingroup$ I don't get it. How did you answer the question? You just said the identity is false, but you didn't explain why... $\endgroup$ Jul 15, 2021 at 14:49
  • $\begingroup$ By Poisson summation, you can show that $S(s) -\sqrt{2\pi}s=\sqrt{2\pi}s\sum_{n\neq 0} e^{-2\pi^2 n^2 s^2} \neq 0$, which also explains why equality seems to hold numerically, because the right hand side is exponentially small (up to an overall factor of $s$ in front). $\endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jul 15, 2021 at 15:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.