4
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator\SU{SU}$In some calculations, I saw the following formula

$$\int_{\SU(2)}\,\mathrm{d}g\,D^{j_{1}}_{m_{1}n_{1}}(g)D^{j_{2}}_{m_{2}n_{2}}(g)D^{j_{3}}_{m_{3}n_{3}}(g)=(-1)^{j_{1}+j_{2}+j_{3}}\begin{pmatrix}j_{1} & j_{2} & j_{3}\\m_{1} & m_{2} & m_{3}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}j_{1} & j_{2} & j_{3}\\n_{1} & n_{2} & n_{3}\end{pmatrix}$$

where $\mathrm{d}g$ denotes the (normalized) Haar measure on $\SU(2)$ and where $D^{j}$ denote Wigner's D-matrices, i.e. the unitary irreducible representation of $\SU(2)$ of dimension $2j+1$. The matrix-looking objects on the right hand side denote Wigner's 3j symbols, which are related to the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients.

The formula appears in the mathematical derivation of the so-called "Ponzano–Regge model" of 3d Euclidean Quantum Gravity. I am wondering how this formula is derived. Furthermore, I have seen in different sources that sometimes the sign factor in front is missing. Another source is mentioning that this formula is only true if $\lvert j_{2}-j_{3}\rvert\leq j_{1}\leq j_{2}+j_{3}$. So all in all I become very confused and would like to know whether this formula is correct and which assumptions are needed. Does maybe someone also have some reference on it?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The sign factor is probably convention (certainly for the related Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, there are different conventions). Since these symbols connect different angular momentum states, and the phases of states can be chosen at will, that implies that also different conventions for the coefficients are possible. $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2021 at 14:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The sign convention I know about would affect both 3j symbols in the same way and then would not matter for the product... $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2021 at 14:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CarloBeenakker - hm, yes, but if the $D$-matrix convention is changed - there are three of those ... $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2021 at 16:35

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

You can find a fully worked-out derivation in these lecture notes. The formula you are looking for is equation (404), written in terms of the Wigner (small-)$d$ matrix. The relationship to the (large-)$D$ matrix goes via the Euler angle parameterization, $$D^{j}_{mm'}(\psi,\theta,\phi)=e^{-im\psi-im'\phi}d^{j}_{mm'}(\theta).$$ The integration over SU(2) with the Haar measure is given in terms of Euler angles by $$U(\psi,\theta,\phi)=\exp(-i(\psi/2)\sigma_1)\exp(-i(\theta/2)\sigma_2)\exp(-i(\phi/2)\sigma_3,$$ $$\int_{\operatorname{SU}(2)}f(U)\,dU=\frac{1}{16\pi^2}\int_0^{2\pi}d\psi\int_0^\pi\sin\theta d\theta\int_0^{4\pi}d\phi\, f[U(\psi,\theta,\phi)].$$

So the desired integral over a product of three $D$-matrices vanishes unless $m_1+m_2+m_3=0=n_1+n_2+n_3$. In that case the integrations over $\psi$ and $\phi$ give a factor $8\pi$, what remains is the integration over $\theta$. Eq. (404) in the lecture notes shows how that is related to the product of $3j$-symbols, $$\frac{1}{2}\int_0^\pi d\theta\,d^{j_1}_{m_1n_1}d^{j_2}_{m_2n_2}d^{j_3}_{m_3n_3}=\begin{pmatrix}j_{1} & j_{2} & j_{3}\\m_{1} & m_{2} & m_{3}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}j_{1} & j_{2} & j_{3}\\n_{1} & n_{2} & n_{3}\end{pmatrix}.$$ Both sides of the equation are equal to zero unless the $j$'s satisfy the triangle inequality, $\lvert j_{2}-j_{3}\rvert\leq j_{1}\leq j_{2}+j_{3}$.

This formula differs from the one in the OP by a factor $(-1)^{j_1+j_2+j_3}$. As a test, I evaluated both sides of the equation with Mathematica, for $j_1=2$, $j_3=3$, $j_4=4$, $m_1=n_1=1$, $m_2=n_2=-1$, $m_3=n_3=0$, and find $5/126$, without a minus sign.

(1/2)*Integrate[ WignerD[{2, 1, 1}, theta]*WignerD[{3, -1, -1}, theta]* WignerD[{4, 0, 0}, theta]*Sin[theta], {theta, 0, Pi}]

ThreeJSymbol[{2, 1}, {3, -1}, {4, 0}]* ThreeJSymbol[{2, 1}, {3, -1}, {4, 0}]

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you possibly have an alternative reference or the name of the lecture notes / the book this was from? The link is dead. $\endgroup$
    – eriugena
    Commented Jul 1 at 15:27
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I fixed the broken link, thanks for noticing it. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 1 at 15:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .