1
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator\Vol{Vol}$This is a cross-post.

Let $0<b<1$ be a fixed parameter, and let $(R(\theta),\theta)$ be the polar coordinates of the ellipse $$E=\{(x,y) \in \mathbb R^2 \, | \, \Bigl(\frac{x}{1/b}\Bigr)^2+\Bigr(\frac{y}{b}\Bigr)^2=1\}.$$ Set $$D=\{(x,y) \in \mathbb R^2 \, | \, 0<\Bigl(\frac{x}{1/b}\Bigr)^2+\Bigl(\frac{y}{b}\Bigr)^2 \le 1\}=\bigcup_{0<r\le1}r E,$$ and let $f:D \to D$ be given in polar coordinates by \begin{equation} \label{1} \bigl(\tilde r R(\theta),\theta\bigr )\mapsto \biggl(\psi(\tilde r)R\bigl(\theta+h(\tilde r)\bigr),\theta+h(\tilde r)\biggr). \tag{1} \end{equation}

$f(\tilde rE)=\psi(\tilde r)E$; the "scale" is given by $\psi$ and the "phase" is given by $h$. If I am not mistaken, the Jacobian of $f$ is given by $$ Jf=\frac{\psi(\tilde r)\psi'(\tilde r)}{R(\theta)}R\bigl(\theta+h(\tilde r)\bigr)\biggl(\frac{R\bigl(\theta+h(\tilde r)\bigr)}{\tilde r R(\theta)}+\frac{R'(\theta)}{R^2(\theta)}h'(\tilde r) \biggr). $$

Question: Do there exist a $C^1$ monotone bijection $\psi:(0,1] \to (0,1]$, and a $C^1$ function $h:(0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$ that satisfy $Jf=1$ everywhere, besides $\psi(x)=x$ and $h=0$ and $h=\pi$ (which correspond to $f=\operatorname{Id}$ and to $f(x,y)=-(x,y)$).

If $h$ is constant, then it easily follows that $h=0$ or $h=\pi$ and $\psi(x)=x$, so I am looking for solutions with non-constant $h$.


Comment: $$R(\theta)\mathrel{:=}\frac{b}{\sqrt{1-\bigl(e \cos(\theta)\bigr)^2}}, e=\sqrt{1-b^4}.$$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ For the case where the ellipse is the disk, one can use the flow of the vector field $H(r) \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 11, 2021 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ Say, $\psi(x)=x$ and $h(x)=\pi$ which corresponds to a central symmetry $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 11, 2021 at 19:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, you are right; I forgot to exclude this possibility. If $h$ is constant, then it easily follows that $h=0$ or $h=\pi$ and $\psi(x)=x$, so I am essentially looking for solutions with non-constant $h$. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 12, 2021 at 16:13
  • $\begingroup$ MathJax note: if you define a new command using syntax like $\newcommand…$, then don't leave a blank line after it, or the blank space will appear in your post. I edited accordingly, and made a few other TeX changes. (For example, a word "Set" seemed to have crept inadvertently from the main text into math mode.) $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Mar 16, 2021 at 12:48

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Here is another way to look at it that you might find useful: Essentially, you are asking the following problem: Given a cylinder $C = (0,R)\times S^1$ and a positive $2$-form $\omega = f(r,\theta)\,\mathrm{d}r\wedge\mathrm{d}\theta$, one wants to describe the diffeomorphisms of $C$ that preserve the $2$-form $\omega$ and the foliation given by the level curves of $r$. For simplicity, I will assume that one only cares about the symplectomorphisms of $(C,\omega)$ that fix the two 'ends' and that the total $\omega$-area of $C$ is finite; I'll say what to do about the larger group and the infinite area case at the end.

First, make a change of variables: Let $$ \rho = \frac1{2\pi}\int_0^r\int_0^{2\pi} f(\tau,\theta)\ \mathrm{d}\tau\wedge\mathrm{d}\theta $$ Then $\rho:(0,R)\to (0,P)$ is a diffeomorphism, where $2\pi P\le\infty$ is the total $\omega$-area of $C$, and we can regard $\rho$ as a function on $C$ with the same level sets as $r$. Obviously, any symplectomorphism of $(C,\omega)$ that preserves the given foliation (and the ends of $C$) will preserve $\rho$, so one might as well replace $r$ by $\rho$ (and set $R=P$). Thus, let's just assume that $\rho=r$.

One now has that $$ \int_0^r\int_0^{2\pi} f(\tau,\theta)\ \mathrm{d}\tau\wedge\mathrm{d}\theta = \int_0^r\int_0^{2\pi} \mathrm{d}\tau\wedge\mathrm{d}\theta, $$ and, differentiating with respect to $r$, this gives $$ \int_0^{2\pi} \bigl(f(r,\theta)-1\bigr)\ \mathrm{d}\theta = 0 $$ for all $r$. In particular, it follows that, setting $$ \phi(r,\theta) = \int_0^\theta \bigl(f(r,\psi)-1\bigr)\,\mathrm{d}\psi, $$ one has $\phi(r,\theta+2\pi) = \phi(r,\theta)$, so that $\phi$ is well-defined on $C$. Moreover, $$ \mathrm{d}r\wedge\mathrm{d}\phi = \bigl(f(r,\theta)-1\bigr)\,\mathrm{d}r\wedge\mathrm{d}\theta, $$ so $\mathrm{d}r\wedge\mathrm{d}(\theta+\phi) = f(r,\theta)\,\mathrm{d}r\wedge\mathrm{d}\theta = \omega$. Setting $\psi = \theta+\phi$, one now has $\omega = \mathrm{d}r\wedge\mathrm{d}\psi$.

In the coordinates $(r,\psi)$ on $C$, it is now easy to describe the symplectomorphism of $(C,\omega)$ that preserve the foliation defined by $\mathrm{d}r=0$, they are just the diffeomorphisms of the form $$ F(r,\psi) = \bigl(r,\psi+g(r)\bigr), $$ where $g$ is an arbitrary (differentiable) function of $r$. Strictly speaking, these are the ones that preserve the ends of $C$. To get the ones that exchange the ends of $C$ while preserving the given foliation, one can compose an $F$ of the above form with the involution $$ H(r,\psi) = (R-r,-\psi). $$

Now, in the case that the $\omega$-area of $C$ is infinite, one has to slightly modify the construction by integrating from a fixed $r=r_0\in(0,R)$ instead of from an 'end'. I.e., one defines $$ \rho = \frac1{2\pi}\int_{r_0}^r\int_0^{2\pi} f(\tau,\theta)\ \mathrm{d}\tau\wedge\mathrm{d}\theta. $$ Then $\rho:(0,R)\to\mathbb{R}$ is a diffeomorphism onto its image, which might be all of $\mathbb{R}$. In fact, if the image is not all of $\mathbb{R}$, then at least one of the two 'ends' has finite area and one can reduce to the case that the image is either $(0,\infty)$ or $(-\infty,0)$ and the arguments go through essentially unchanged. When the image is all of $\mathbb{R}$, one can still replace $r$ by $\rho$ as a coordinate on $C$ and the one still has $$ \int_0^{2\pi} \bigl(f(r,\theta)-1\bigr)\ \mathrm{d}\theta = 0, $$ and again, everything goes through as before, but now, when one gets to the coordinate system $(r,\psi)$ in which $\omega = \mathrm{d}r\wedge\mathrm{d}\psi$, the group of diffeomorphisms that preserve the level sets of $r$ and the $2$-form $\omega$ are now generated by $$ F(r,\psi) = \bigl(r+c,\psi+g(r)\bigr) $$ where $c$ is any constant and $g$ is any (smooth) function of $r$ and $$ H(r,\psi) = (-r,-\psi). $$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

This is a tentatve (since I am not sure I am parsing your query correctly) comment, but too long for that format. I take it that you are asking about the existence of diffeomorphisms of the interior of an ellipse which are area-preserving and preserve the foliation consisting of dilations of the boundary. The answer to this question is--yes, there are a multitude. The rather imprecise formulation is that if you specify two distinct radial vectors on the one hand and two suitable curves from the centre to the boundary, then there is a unique such diffeomorphism which maps the former pair of curves to the latter.

There are two practical problems which are (from a mathematical point if view) identical to yours (stripped of the specifics)

  1. thermodynamics--identifying possible sysems of isotherms and adiabats of a thermodynamical system;

  2. cartography--identifying possible systems of parallels and meridians of area-equivalent map projection.

In both cases, the rough and ready answer is as follows: you can choose one of the systems at random (think hyperbolae $xy=c$ for isotherms ($T=pV$!) and $y=c$ for parallels). One can then choose two adiabats, resp., two meridians at will and this determines the whole configuration.

There doesn't seem to be much literature on this but for the thermodynamics you could try the arXiv papers 1102.1540, 1108.4758.

Edit: If we use new variables $u$ and $v$ where $u=(b^2 x^2+y^2/b^2)/2$ and $v$ is the angle $CAB$ where $A$ is the origin, $B$ is $(1,0)$ and $C$ is $(bx,y/b)$ (these are just polar coordinates in the circle case $b=1$ adjusted to make the transformation area-preserving ), then the required transformations have the form $$(u,v) \mapsto (u,v+f(u))$$ for suitable functions $f$. (This is basically the solution of Robert Bryant but without using heavy machinery).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ By the way, in this answer, I was more interested in explicating the general situaion but one can use the methods developed to give an explicit solutjon in the situation of the OP. It's a bit of work, but if anybody is interested ... $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 13, 2021 at 11:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .