4
$\begingroup$

I was reading Heilbronn’s 1934 paper where he proves that $H(d) \to \infty$ as $d \to -\infty$, where $H(d)$ is the ideal class number of the imaginary quadratic field with discriminant $d$. I couldn't reason out one of his claims in the proof to a lemma. I have attached an image of this part below. Part of the proof to lemma XIV

I am struggling with the claim that ".. $a^H$ is at least four times representable by the principal form". I suppose that he is appealing to a lemma which is mentioned earlier in the paper without proof, I state it below in a slightly modified way preceded briefly by some background.

Let $I$ be an ideal in the ring of integers of $K = \mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{d}]$ with $\mathbb{Z}$-basis $(\alpha, \beta)$. Then we may associate $I$ with the form $f_{I, (\alpha, \beta)}(x, y) = \frac{Nm(\alpha x + \beta y)}{Nm(I)}$. It can be proven that this $f_{I, (\alpha, \beta)}$ is an integral primitive binary quadratic form with discriminant $d$, and further that this induces a group isomorphism between the classgroup of $K$ and the proper equivalence classes of forms with discriminant $d$ under certain restricrtions to include only positive definite forms.

The following is the statement of the lemma: If $J$ is any ideal in the same class as $I$ then $Nm(J)$ can be represented by $f_{I, (\alpha, \beta)}$ in two distinct ways.

The following is my proof of this fact: W.l.o.g we may assume that $J = I$. Now since $Nm(I) \in I$, $Nm(I) = \alpha x + \beta y$ for some $x, y \in \mathbb{Z}$. Then $f_{I, (\alpha, \beta)}(x, y) = \frac{Nm(\alpha x + \beta y)}{Nm(I)} = \frac{Nm(Nm(I))}{Nm(I)} = Nm(I)$. And $f_{I, (\alpha, \beta)}(-x, -y)$ is another representation.

Going back to Heilbronn’s claim, I am assuming that since $\mathfrak{a}^H \neq \mathfrak{a'}^H$ and the norm of each of them is representable in at least two different ways by the principal form (based on the lemma above) $a^H = Nm(\mathfrak{a}^H) = Nm(\mathfrak{a'}^H)$ is representable in at least 4 ways.

But my question is that, couldn't it be the case that these representations overlap. For example, suppose $(\alpha, \beta)$ is a $\mathbb{Z}$-basis for $\mathfrak{a}^H$ then $(\alpha', \beta')$ is a $\mathbb{Z}$-basis for $\mathfrak{a'}^H$. Here I use $'$ to denote conjugation. Isn't it possible that $a^H = Nm(\mathfrak{a}^H) = \alpha x + \beta y = \alpha' x + \beta' y = Nm(\mathfrak{a'}^H) = a^H$. In that case, going through the proof of the lemma above, it is easy to see that the representations overlap.

Probably I am missing something here. Would be really helpful if someone could provide a clarification.

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

One can see more directly that $a^H$ has a representation by the principal form with $y\neq 0$ (hence also with $y>0$). Indeed, let $$\omega:=\begin{cases}\sqrt{d},&d\equiv 0\pmod{4}; \\ (1+\sqrt{d})/2,&d\equiv 1\pmod{4}.\end{cases}$$ Then the ring of integers is $\mathfrak{o}=\mathbb{Z}+\omega\mathbb{Z}$, and the principal form is $(x+\omega y)(x+\omega'y)$. By assumption, $\mathfrak{a}^H$ is a principal ideal, say $\mathfrak{a}^H=\lambda\mathfrak{o}$ with $\lambda\in\mathfrak{o}$. In addition, $\mathfrak{a}^H\neq \mathfrak{a}'^H$, hence $\lambda\neq\lambda'$. Let us write $\lambda$ as $x+y\omega$ with $x,y\in\mathbb{Z}$, then $y\neq 0$, and $$a^H=N(\mathfrak{a}^H)=\lambda\lambda'=(x+\omega y)(x+\omega'y).$$ Done.

P.S. When constructing $f_{I,(\alpha,\beta)}(x,y)$, one needs to use an oriented basis $(\alpha,\beta)$ of $I$. Oriented means that $(\alpha'\beta-\alpha\beta')/\sqrt{d}>0$, or equivalently $(\alpha'\beta-\alpha\beta')/\sqrt{d}=N(I)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.