3
$\begingroup$

Can you provide a proof for the following proposition:

Proposition. Let quadrilateral $ABCD$ be inscribed into a circle with center $O$ and circumscribed around a circle with center $I$. Let $X$ be a common point of inscribed circle and side $AB$ , $Y$ a common point of inscribed circle and side $BC$ , $Z$ a common point of inscribed circle and side $CD$ , $W$ a common point of inscribed circle and side $DA$ and let $S$ be the intersection point of the line segments $XZ$ and $YW$ . I claim that the incenters of the $\triangle SAB$, $\triangle SBC$, $\triangle SCD$ and $\triangle SDA$ are concyclic.

enter image description here

GeoGebra applet that demonstrates this proposition can be found here.

My attempt:

Let $I_1,I_2,I_3,I_4$ be the incenters of $\triangle SAB,\triangle SBC,\triangle SCD$ and $\triangle SDA$ , respectively. My idea is to apply Pythagorean theorem on $\triangle SI_1I_2$, $\triangle SI_2I_3$,$\triangle SI_3I_4$ and $\triangle SI_4I_1$ in order to express lengths of the line segments $I_1I_2,I_2I_3,I_3I_4,I_4I_1$ using lengths of the line segments $SI_1,SI_2,SI_3,SI_4$ and then to apply Ptolomy's theorem on quadrilateral $I_1I_2I_3I_4$ , but I have difficulty proving that points $I_1,I_2,I_3$ and $I_4$ lie on the line segments $XZ$ and $YW$.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

We can prove $I_1 \in \overline{SX}$ using a property of bicentric quadrilaterals, $\frac{AX}{XB}=\frac{DZ}{ZC}$. Since $\triangle ASD \sim \triangle BSC$, $$\frac{AX}{XB}=\frac{AX+DZ}{XB+ZC}=\frac{AD}{BC}=\frac{AS}{BS}$$ so $\overline{SX}$ bisects $\angle ASB$ by the angle bisector theorem. Now by the angle bisector theorem and equal tangents, $$\frac{SI_1}{I_1X}=\frac{SB}{BX}=\frac{SB}{BY}=\frac{SI_2}{I_2Y}.$$ Analogous reasoning shows $\frac{SI_1}{I_1X}=\frac{SI_2}{I_2Y}=\frac{SI_3}{I_3Z}=\frac{SI_4}{I_4W}$ so the concyclicity follows from a dilation of the incircle at $S$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This is a well known theorem. $ABCD$ doesn't have to be bicentric, it only needs to be tangential.

The paper Josefsson, More Characterizations of Tangential Quadrilaterals has a good write up, specifically on the OP problem in Section 4, along with references.

For example, https://www.cut-the-knot.org/htdocs/dcforum/DCForumID6/415.shtml.

And https://cms.math.ca/publications/crux/issue/?volume=25&issue=4 (pg 243-245)

The original conjecture had $ABCD$ cyclic, and it is possible that the proof is easier if that is a condition.

A quick summary of the subtriangles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangential_quadrilateral#Characterizations_in_the_four_subtriangles

Update: See also Theorem 20 of Grinberg, Circumscribed quadrilaterals revisited

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for sharing the links. $\endgroup$
    – Pedja
    Commented Jan 8, 2021 at 7:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .