2
$\begingroup$

I am getting stuck in a detail in a paper. It's about the axi symmetric Navier Stokes equations $$u_t - \nu\,\Delta u + u\cdot \nabla u + \nabla p=0$$ We consider in cylindrical coordinates $u=(u^r, u^\theta,u^z)$. And we have the following vorticity equation in cylindrical form. $$\omega^r = \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial u^z}{\partial \theta} - \frac{\partial u^\theta}{\partial z} = - \frac{\partial u^\theta}{\partial z}, \\ \omega^\theta = \frac{\partial u^r}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial u^z}{\partial r}, \\ \omega^z = \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r u^\theta) - \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial u^r}{\partial \theta} = \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r u^\theta).$$ My question goes as follows: Suppose $J=\frac{w^r}{r}$, then how to derive the following steps?

\begin{align} & \int J(\omega^r \partial_r+\omega^z \partial_z)\frac{u^r}{r} r \, dr \, dz \\[8pt] = {} & \int [\nabla\times (u^\theta e_\theta)] \left(J \, \nabla \frac{u^r}{r}\right) r \, dr\,dz \\[8pt] = {} & \int (u^\theta e_\theta) \left(\nabla J\times\nabla \frac{u^r}{r}\right) r \, dr \, dz \end{align}

I'm assuming some integration by parts is involved but couldn't derive them; besides, where does the cross product come from? The equality above that bugs me is from the bottom of page 11 of this paper.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

There's a typo in the last two expressions you write: $u^{\theta } /r$ should be $u^r /r$.

Then, it seems to check out (for any well-behaved $J$): In the first expression, just insert the expressions for the $\omega $ in terms of the $u$; in the second expression, note $$ \nabla \times (u^{\theta } e_{\theta } ) = e_z \partial_{r} u^{\theta } + e_z u^{\theta } /r - e_r \partial_{z} u^{\theta } $$ and $$ \nabla (u^r /r) = e_r \left( \frac{1}{r} \partial_{r} u^r -\frac{1}{r^2 } u^r \right) + e_{\theta } \frac{1}{r^2 }\partial_{\theta } u^r +e_z \frac{1}{r} \partial_{z} u^r $$ and multiply that out - no integration needed, already the integrands are identical. To get to the third expression, consider the volume integral of $$ \nabla \cdot \left[ (u^{\theta } e_{\theta } ) \times (J\nabla(u^r /r)) \right] $$ You don't say anything about the boundary conditions, but I suppose the field in the square brackets doesn't have net flux out of the volume - then this vanishes by Gauss' theorem. Also, the $u$ have to be regular enough so that different components of $\nabla $ commute on them ...

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .