1
$\begingroup$

This is when studying about Chern classes from Kobayashi and Nomizu.

Let $\pi:E\rightarrow M$ be a complex vector bundle with fibre $\mathbb{C}^r$ and Group $G=GL(r,\mathbb{C})$.

Let $p:P\rightarrow M$ be associated principal $G$ bundle. Let $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{gl}(r,\mathbb{C})$ denote the Lie algebra of $G$.

Given $B\in \mathfrak{g}$, the determinant $\text{det}\left(\lambda I_r-\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}} B\right)$ is $\sum_{k=0}^r a_k\lambda^{r-k}$ for some $a_k\in \mathbb{C}$.

Given $B\in \mathfrak{g}$, we have $r$ elements in $\mathbb{C}$. Varying $B$ over $\mathfrak{g}$, gives $r$ functions $f_k:\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$.

We have $$\text{det}\left(\lambda I_r-\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}} X\right)=\sum_{k=0}^r f_k(X) \lambda ^{r-k}$$ These $f_k:\mathfrak{gl}(r,\mathbb{C})\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ are homogeneous, degree $k$ polynomial functions on $\mathfrak{gl}(r,\mathbb{C})$. I can recall what are polynomial functions on a vector space if some one needs it.

These are $GL(r,\mathbb{C})$ invariant i.e., $f_k(X)=f_k(DXD^{-1})$ for all $D\in Gl(r,\mathbb{C})$. These $f_k$ gives a symmetric, multilinear, $Gl(r,\mathbb{C})$ invariant $\mathbb{C}$ valued mappings $f_k\in I_{\mathbb{C}}^k(G)$.

Let $\Gamma$ be a connection on $P(M,G)$ and $\Omega$ be its curvature form. This $f_k$ gives a $\mathbb{C}$ valued $2k$ form $f_k(\Omega)$ on $P$. Let $\gamma_k$ be the unique $\mathbb{C}$ valued closed $2k$-form on $M$ such that $p^*(\gamma_k)=f_k(\Omega)$.

This gives $[\gamma_k]\in H^{2k}(M,\mathbb{C})$. But $k$-th Chern class are supposed to take values in $H^{2k}(M,\mathbb{R})$. What is the obvious map $H^{2k}(M,\mathbb{C})\rightarrow H^{2k}(M,\mathbb{R})$ to look for to get an element in $H^{2k}(M,\mathbb{R})$?

We then have $$\sum_{k=0}^r f_k(\Omega)=\sum_{k=0}^rp^*(\gamma_k)=p^*(1+\gamma_1+\cdots+\gamma_r)$$ Then,they (Kobayashi and Nomizu,page no $307$) write $$\text{det}\left(I_r-\frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{-1}} \Omega\right)= p^*(1+\gamma_1+\cdots+\gamma_r)$$ I see that they are just replacing $X$ with $\Omega$. But what does it mean to say determinant of $\Omega$?

We have $\gamma_k\in H^{2k}(M,\mathbb{R})$. So, $1+\gamma_1+\cdots+\gamma_r\in H^*(M,\mathbb{R})$ which then imply that $p^*(1+\gamma_1+\cdots+\gamma_r)\in H^*(P,\mathbb{R})$. So, $\text{det}\left(I_r-\frac{1}{2\pi i} \Omega\right)\in H^*(P,\mathbb{R})$. How is it defined?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Try reading the nice short paper of Chern, Vector bundles and connections, in the Global Analysis and Geometry book. $\endgroup$ – Ben McKay Dec 23 '18 at 11:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Since $\Omega$ is a matrix of 2-forms, and 2-forms commute with one another, they sit in a commutative algebra of even degree forms, so use your favourite explicit formula for determinant in any commutative ring. Reality comes from the fact that you could have picked a reduction of structure group to the unitary group, and computed there instead, giving the same cohomology classes. This is in a lot of reference works, like Griffiths and Harris for example. $\endgroup$ – Ben McKay Dec 23 '18 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ @BenMcKay Ok... $\gamma_{k}$ is complex valued $2k$ form on $M$... what does it then mean to say $[\gamma_k]\in H^{2k}(M,\mathbb{R})$? $\endgroup$ – Praphulla Koushik Dec 23 '18 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ My problem is I am comfortable with connections on principal bundles and those two references uses connections on vector bundles... Can you think of some book/paper where this is done using principal bundles.. ? @BenMcKay $\endgroup$ – Praphulla Koushik Dec 23 '18 at 13:00
  • $\begingroup$ @BenMcKay Can you see my answer and let me know if that is correct? $\endgroup$ – Praphulla Koushik Dec 23 '18 at 13:41
1
$\begingroup$

Curvature $\Omega$ is a $\mathfrak{g}$ valued $2$-form on $P$ i.e., for each $p\in P$, we have $\Omega(p):T_pP\times T_pP\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}$.

As $\mathfrak{g}$ is $\mathfrak{gl}(r,\mathbb{C})$, given $(v_1,v_2)\in T_pP\times T_pP$, we get a $r\times r$ matrix $\Omega(p)(v_1,v_2)=[a_{ij}]$.

Once we fix $(v_1,v_2)$ we get $a_{ij}\in \mathbb{C}$, these depend on $(v_1,v_2)$. So, we have $$\Omega(p)(v_1,v_2)=[a_{ij}(v_1,v_2)]$$ Here $a_{ij}$ are functions $a_{ij}:T_pP\times T_pP\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ with $(v_1,v_2)\mapsto a_{ij}(v_1,v_2)\in \mathbb{C}$.

We can write $\Omega(p)(v_1,v_2)=[a_{ij}(v_1,v_2)]$ as $\Omega(p)=[a_{ij}]$.

So, for each $p\in P$, $\Omega(p)$ is a matrix of functions $a_{ij}:T_pP\times T_pP\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$.

Thus, we can write $\Omega$ as an $r\times r $ matrix $[\Omega_{ij}]$ where $\Omega_{ij}$ is a $\mathbb{C}$ valued $2$ form on $P$ given by $\Omega_{ij}(p):T_pP\times T_pP\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$ is the map $a_{ij}:T_pP\times T_pP\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$.

Thus, $I_r-\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}}\Omega$ is an $r\times r$ matrix whose $i,j$-th entry is $\delta_{ij}-\frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{-1}}\Omega_{ij}$.

Let $\omega,\tau$ be $p$-form and $q$-form respectively. Then, $\omega\wedge \tau=(-1)^{pq}\tau\wedge \omega$. We are only dealing with $2$-forms here. So, $pq=4$ and $\omega\wedge \tau=\tau\wedge \omega$ for each $\omega,\tau$.

We have a matrix $I_r-\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}}\Omega$ whose entries are coming from a commutative ring (of $2$-forms).

We can then talk about determinant of that matrix and $\text{det}(I_r-\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}}\Omega)$ is precisely that.

For simplicity, take $r=2$. Then, $$\text{det}(I-\Omega)=\text{det}\begin{bmatrix}1-\Omega_{11}&-\Omega_{12}\\ -\Omega_{21}&1-\Omega_{22}\end{bmatrix}=1-\underbrace{(\Omega_{11}+\Omega_{22})}_{2-form}+\underbrace{\Omega_{11}\wedge\Omega_{12}-\Omega_{21}\wedge \Omega_{12}}_{4-form}$$ We then have $$p^*(1+\gamma_1+\gamma_2)=1+\underbrace{p^*(\gamma_1)}_{2-form}++\underbrace{p^*(\gamma_2)}_{4-form}$$ So, it makes sense to say $\text{det}(I-\Omega)=p^*(1+\gamma_1+\gamma_2)$ (I ignored $\frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{-1}}$ to keep it simple).

We have $p^*(\gamma_1)=-\Omega_{11}-\Omega_{22}$ and $p^*(\gamma_2)=\Omega_{11}\wedge\Omega_{12}-\Omega_{21}\wedge \Omega_{12}$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is done on suggestion of Ben (in comments) $\endgroup$ – Praphulla Koushik Dec 23 '18 at 13:31

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.