1
$\begingroup$

Let $g_\text{flat}$ denote the Euclidean metric on $\mathbb{R}^n$ and $A^u$ denote the $(1,1)$-Schouten tensor of $u^{\frac{4}{n-2}}g_\text{flat}$, $$ A^u = -\frac{2}{n-2}u^{-\frac{n+2}{n-2}}\nabla^{2}u+\frac{2n}{(n-2)^2} u^{-\frac{2n}{n-2}}\nabla u\otimes \nabla u - \frac{2}{(n-2)^2} u^{-\frac{2n}{n-2}}|\nabla u|^2 g_\text{flat}.$$

Consider the equation $$ \sigma_k(\lambda(A^{u}))=K(x) \quad \text {and}\quad \lambda(A^{ u}) \in \Gamma_k \text{ on } \, \mathbb{R}^n,$$where $\lambda(A^{ u})=(\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_n)$ denote the eigenvalues of $A^u$, $\sigma_k$ is the $k$-elementary symmetric function, i.e., $$\sigma_k(\lambda)=\sum\limits_{i_1 < \cdots < i_k} \lambda_{i_1} \cdots \lambda_{i_k},$$ and $\Gamma_k$ is the connected component of $\{\lambda \in \mathbb{R}^n: \sigma_k(\lambda) > 0\}$ which contains the positive cone $\{\lambda \in \mathbb{R}^n: \lambda_1, \ldots, \lambda_n > 0\}$ (to ensure the equation is elliptic.) $K(x)$ is a function defined on $\mathbb{R}^n$.

Let $\hat{u}(z)=|z|^{2-n} u\left(\frac{z}{|z|^2}\right)$, is it true $$\sigma_k(\lambda(A^{\hat{u}(z)}))=K\left(\frac{z}{|z|^2}\right) \quad \text{and} \quad \lambda(A^{ \hat{u}}) \in \Gamma_k \text{ on } \, \mathbb{R}^n?$$ This is well-known that $\hat{u}(z)$ is a Kelvin transformation of $u$, but seems not easy to check the above equation. Did I miss someting? Thanks for any help.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ I am not familiar with the notation. What is are the definitions of $\lambda$, $\sigma_k$, and $\Gamma_k$? $\endgroup$
    – Ben McKay
    Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 8:13
  • $\begingroup$ sorry! I will revise the question. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 9:46
  • $\begingroup$ what is $\tilde{u}$? Is it just $u$? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 13:24
  • $\begingroup$ Some typos, sorry! $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 13:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The point is that the transformation property is at the level of the Schouten tensor itself and holds pointwise, so if the Schouten tensor transforms appropriately, so must the eigenvalues and other matrix invariants. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 13:52

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

This follows easily from the fact that the Kelvin transform is a conformal diffeomorphism and the naturality of the Schouten tensor.

Let $\Phi(z) := \frac{z}{\lvert z\rvert^2}$ denote the Kelvin transform. It is easy to check that $\Phi$ is a conformal diffeomorphism. In fact, $$ \Phi^\ast g_0 = \lvert z\rvert^{-4} g_0 . $$ (As suggested in the comments, this is very easy to check in spherical coordinates, where $g_0 = dr^2 + r^2g_{S^{n-1}}$.) Therefore $$ \Phi^\ast g_u = \Phi^\ast (u^{\frac{4}{n-2}}g_0) = (u \circ \Phi)^{\frac{4}{n-2}}\lvert z\rvert^{-4} g_0 = \left( \lvert z\rvert^{2-n}(u\circ \Phi)\right)^{\frac{4}{n-2}}g_0 = \hat u^{\frac{4}{n-2}}g_0 . $$

The naturality of the Schouten tensor is the statement $\Psi^\ast (A^g) = A^{\Psi^\ast g}$ for any diffeomorphism $\Psi$. Therefore $\Psi^\ast (g^{-1}A^g) = (\Psi^\ast g)^{-1}A^{\Psi^\ast g}$ where, as usual, $g^{-1}$ is the musical operator that raises one index.

Finally, recall that $\sigma_k(\lambda(A^u)) = \sigma_k(g_u^{-1}A^u)$, as mentioned in my answer to your other question. Combining the above gives \begin{align*} K\left( \frac{z}{\lvert z\rvert^2} \right) & = (\Phi^\ast K)(z) \\ & = \left( \Phi^\ast \sigma_k(g_u^{-1}A^{u}) \right)(z) \\ & = \sigma_k(g_{\hat u}^{-1}A^{\hat u})(z) . \end{align*} Repeating this argument with different values of $k$ also shows that the positive cone is preserved by the Kelvin transform.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks again! I want to ask here the notation $g_0$ is the Euclidean metric $g_{flat}$? By the way, if convenient, would you recommend me some references that are friendly to read. Thank you very much. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 15:08
  • $\begingroup$ Right, $g_0$ is the flat metric. Without knowing your background and interests, I'm unsure of what would be a "friendly" reference. A good starting point might be one of Alice Chang's survey articles on fully nonlinear elliptic equations. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19, 2023 at 18:49
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I have one more question, the Kelvin transform make a dialation on the variable $z\rightarrow\frac{z}{|z|^2}$, however the origin $z=0$ that is not make sense will not make any problem? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 20, 2023 at 2:47
  • $\begingroup$ In general you don’t have an equation which makes sense at $z=0$. There are some removable singularity theorems under appropriate assumptions on $u$ and $K$. You can probably find details in papers by Yanyan Li or Maria del Mar Gonzalez from the early- to mid-2000s, but I don’t know the most general reference. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 20, 2023 at 2:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .