Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a compact (real) Lie group. We know that the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ of $\mathcal{G}$ is, by definition, the space of all left-invariant (smooth) vector fields over $\mathcal{G}$ with bracket given by the commutator. We also know that it is isomorphic, as a Lie algebra, with $T_e\mathcal{G}$ (the tangent space to $\mathcal{G}$ at the neutral element $e$).

Consider the Hopf algebra of representative functions $H:=\mathcal{R}_{\mathbb{R}}(\mathcal{G})$ associated to $\mathcal{G}$ and recall that $H\subseteq \mathcal{C}^\infty(\mathcal{G})$ is a dense subspace with respect to the supremum norm (Proposition I.3.12 of Brocker, Dieck, Representations of Compact Lie Groups together with Peter-Weyl Throem). The Lie algebra $\mathcal{P}(H^\circ)$ of primitive elements of its finite dual is isomorphic the Lie algebra of left-invariant derivations ${^{H}\mathsf{Der}_{\mathbb{R}}(H,H)}$ (i.e., derivations $\delta:H\to H$ such that $\Delta\delta=(H\otimes \delta)\Delta$).

I would expect to have an isomorphism $\mathfrak{g}\cong {^{H}\mathsf{Der}_{\mathbb{R}}(H,H)}$.

Q1. Is this true?

I didn't find it anywhere in the literature, whence I am trying to provide one by myself.

Let $X$ be a left-invariant vector field and let $\varphi$ be a smooth function on $\mathcal{G}$. Then $\boldsymbol{X}(\varphi):\mathcal{G}\to \mathbb{R}$ given by $\boldsymbol{X}(\varphi)(g) = X_g(\varphi)$ ($X_g\in T_g\mathcal{G}$) is a smooth function and hence we have an assignment $\boldsymbol{X}:\mathcal{C}^\infty(\mathcal{G})\to \mathcal{C}^\infty(\mathcal{G})$. One can verify that this induces a Lie algebra map $$\mathfrak{g}\to {^{H}\mathsf{Der}_{\mathbb{R}}(H,H)}: X\mapsto \boldsymbol{X}.$$ To provide a candidate inverse to this morphism, I consider a left-invariant derivation $\delta$ and for every $g$ in $\mathcal{G}$ the function $\delta_g:\mathcal{R}_{\mathbb{R}}(\mathcal{G})\to \mathbb{R}, \varphi\mapsto\delta(\varphi)(g)$. Now, I would expect to be able to extend such a function to the whole $\mathcal{C}^\infty(\mathcal{G})$, maybe resorting to the Continuous Linear Extension Theorem (see Theorem 5.7.6 in Foundations of Applied Mathematics, Volume I: Mathematical Analysis by Humpherys, Jarvis, Evans), but I didn't manage to.

Q2. Could somebody suggest a way to do this?

Q3. Is there some reference in which this is treated in some detail?

OT: I already asked it on MSE, but maybe it could be that this question is more suitable for MO.

  • $\begingroup$ As far as I know, $\mathcal{G}$ is used for Lie groupoids.. you can use normal $G$?? $\endgroup$ Sep 11, 2018 at 10:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Of course I could, but it does not make too much sense in my opinion. It's just a matter of notation and I am used to use normal $G$ for discrete groups. If you really think that using $G$ instead of $\mathcal{G}$ improves the readability of the question, you have my approval in editing it (presently it's a bit difficult for me as I don't have my laptop) $\endgroup$ Sep 11, 2018 at 11:25
  • $\begingroup$ When you define these spaces of derivations $H\to H$ are you imposing any a priori assumption of continuity? (I have faint alarm bells ringing in my head in view of the various answers and comments at mathoverflow.net/questions/6074/… but this could easily be a false alarm on my part) $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Jul 8, 2019 at 2:38
  • $\begingroup$ @YemonChoi No, actually I am not imposing any additional assumption apart from those explicitly mentioned. In particular, I am using Abe's book on Hopf algebras as main reference for these notions. So, derivations $\delta:H\to H$ are simply $\mathbb{R}$-linear maps such that $\delta(ab)=\delta(a)b+a\delta(b)$ (or, if you prefer, derivations from $H$ into the $H$-bimodule $H$ itself). $\endgroup$ Jul 8, 2019 at 13:24

1 Answer 1


Some years ago we did something that -I think- answers the algebraic version of your question [FS].

If you have a Hopf algebra $H$, then the counit gives you a map $\varepsilon_* :\mathrm{Hom}(H,H)\to \mathrm{Hom}(H,k)$. This map has a nice and natural splitting $$H^*\to \mathrm{End}(H)$$ $$f\mapsto F$$ where $F(h)=h_1f(h_2)$. This splitting actually lift to a splitting of the maps $$\varepsilon_*:\mathrm{Hom}(H^{\otimes n},H)\to \mathrm{Hom}(H^{\otimes n},k)$$ for all $n$, in a way that it is compatible with Hochschild coboundary, and stable under Gerstenhaber bracket (see the proof of Theorem 1.5 in the reference above).

In particular, $\mathrm{Der}(H,k)$ injects into $\mathrm{Der}(H,H)$. For $H=\mathcal O(G)$, $\mathrm{Der}(H,k)$ (with $k$ viewed as $H$-module via $\varepsilon$) is -almost by definition- ${\frak g}=T_e(G)$, and $\mathrm{Der}(H,H)$ is the algebraic version of ${\frak X}(G)$. The compatibility with Gerstenhaber structure says that these maps are Lie algebra maps. So you get a "Hopf"-way of defining "the unique left invariant vector field" associated to an element in the tangent space of the identity, and for $H=\mathcal O(G)$ you get a precise map $$\mathrm{Der}(\mathcal O(G),\mathcal O(G)) \cong \mathcal O(G)\otimes \mathrm{Der}(\mathcal O(G),k) =\mathcal O(G)\otimes\frak g.$$

Regarding the $C^\infty$-problems, I think that if you write the formula " $F(h)=h_1f(h_2)$" in a diagrammatic way, you should be able to do the $C^\infty$-case.

[FS] M. Farinati - A. Solotar, G-Structure on the cohomology of Hopf algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (2004), 2859-2865.] (also in https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0207243)

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much, I will have a look at your reference and see if it helps. However, my main concern is that in the algebraic setting that "identification" between $T_e\mathcal{G}$, $^H\mathsf{Der}_{\Bbbk}(H,H)$ and $\mathcal{P}(H^\circ)$ is more or less well established and widely used (see Humphreys, Linear Algebraic Groups, §9.1; Hochschild, Basic Theory of Algebraic Groups and Lie Algebras, §III.3; Abe, Hopf Algebras, §4.3.1), but it seems that in the differential setting things are much more complicated (Hochschild and Mostow have a whole bunch of papers on the topic). $\endgroup$ Jun 8, 2019 at 9:07
  • $\begingroup$ For these reasons I am really interested in the $\mathcal{C}^{\infty}$-setting $\endgroup$ Jun 8, 2019 at 9:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.