3
$\begingroup$

In my research I need to compute the group homology of the dicyclic group Dic3, which is a semi-direct product of $\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$, and let's denote it by $G$, we have a short exact sequence, \begin{equation} 0 \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z} \rightarrow G \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z} \rightarrow 0 \end{equation} My idea is to use Lyndon–Hochschild–Serre spectral sequence \begin{equation} H_p(\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}, H_q(\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z})) \Rightarrow H_{p+q}(G,\mathbb{Z}) \end{equation} We already know that \begin{equation} H_2(\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}, \mathbb{Z})=H_2(\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}, \mathbb{Z})=0 \end{equation} so we deduce that \begin{equation} H_2(G,\mathbb{Z})=H_1(\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}, H_1(\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z})) \end{equation} We also know \begin{equation} H_1(\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z} \end{equation} Question 1: Does $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$ acts trivially on $H_1(\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z})$?

If so, we could conclude that $H_2(G,\mathbb{Z})=0$.

Question 2: If the action of $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$ on $H_1(\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z})$ is not trivial, do we still have $$H_1(\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}, H_1(\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z})) =0 $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $H_1(-,\mathbf{Z})$ is the abelianization, so here the action identifies to the original one. So Question 1 has a negative answer. $\endgroup$ – YCor May 8 '18 at 12:23
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor, Thank you. What about Question 2? There is only one non-trivial action of $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$ on $\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$. Are there any references which might be helpful? $\endgroup$ – Wenzhe May 8 '18 at 12:31
  • $\begingroup$ But $G$ has cyclic Sylow subgroups, from which we can conclude that $H_2(G,{\mathbb Z})=0$. $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt May 8 '18 at 12:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You could start with en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schur_multiplier or groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Schur_multiplier $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt May 8 '18 at 12:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes that's right. In fact $H_i(F,V)$ and $H^i(F,V)$ are zero for all nonzero $i$. This is in VI.8 of K.S. Brown's book on Cohomology of Groups, for example. $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt May 8 '18 at 13:43
5
$\begingroup$

In the spectral sequence, notice that by the remarks of YCor and Derek Holt, it is almost trivial: since the orders of $Z/4$ and $Z/3$ are prime to each other, all homology groups of the form $H_p(Z/4,H_q(Z/3,Z))$ are zero when $p\neq 0$ or $q\neq 0$. The only remaining groups are on the ``bounadry'' of the spectral sequence, and all differentials are trivial. It thus holds that $H_n(G,Z) = H_n(Z/3,Z)^{Z/4}\oplus H_n(Z/4)$. To understand the action of $Z/4$, you can simply check it on the level of resolutions. Write the standard resolution for $Z$ over $Z/3$. You will then find out that $H^n(Z/3,Z)$ is zero for $n$ even, and is $Z/3$ for $n$ odd. The action of a generator of $Z/4$ is then by $-1$ if $n=4k+1$ and is trivial if $n=4k+3$. In particular, $H_2$ is trivial (but this way you can also calculate all the homology groups).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.