3
$\begingroup$

I have a question which is fairly elementary, but first I must provide relevant context. Without it, my question would seem rather arbitrary and scarcely interesting. Note also that my question can be answered without reading what follows.

Let $j(\omega)$ be the modular invariant, $\Gamma$ be the modular group and $H$ the upper half-plane. Define $\gamma_2(\omega)=\sqrt[3]{j(\omega)}$ using the cube root which is real on the imaginary axis.

Let $\tau\in H$ satisfy \begin{equation} A\tau^2+B\tau+C=0,\ (A,B,C)=1. \end{equation}

By Class field theory the value $j(\tau)$ is an algebraic integer of degree exactly $h(D)$, where $D=B^2-4AC$. Since $\gamma_2(\tau)^3-j(\tau)=0$ one would expect the degree of $\gamma_2(\tau)$ to be $3h(D)$. But it turns out that, if $(A,3)=1$ and $3\mid B$, the degree of $\gamma_2(\tau)$ is also $h(D)$.

Now I indicate how this result can be proved.

Set $\varepsilon=e^{-\frac{2\pi i}{3}}$. It can be shown that for $\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)\in\Gamma$ we have

\begin{equation} \gamma_2{\left(\frac{a\omega+b}{c\omega+d}\right)}=\varepsilon^{ab-ac+cd-a^2cd}\gamma_2(\omega). \end{equation} This implies that $\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(\tau)$ if and only if $A\omega=\tau$, with $A=\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)\in\Gamma$ satisfying $ab-ac+cd-a^2cd \equiv 0 \ (\textrm{mod}\ 3)$, except when $\omega \equiv e^{-\frac{2\pi i}{3}} \ (\textrm{mod}\ \Gamma)$, in which case $\gamma_2(\omega)=0$.

Next define \begin{equation} S(n,3)=\bigg\lbrace\begin{pmatrix} r & s\\ 0 & t \end{pmatrix}:rt=n,r>0,(r,s,t)=1,3\mid s,0\leq s <3t \bigg\rbrace. \end{equation} Let $\omega$ be in the upper half-plane $H$. Consider the polynomial \begin{equation} \phi_{n,\omega}(x)=\prod_{M\in S(n,3)}\left(x-\gamma_2(M\omega)\gamma_2(\omega)^{-n} \right). \end{equation} It takes some work to show that the coefficients of this polynomial are invariant under $\Gamma$, and therefore rational functions in $j(\omega)$. After additional work we conclude that they are in fact polynomials with integral coefficients. In this way we get a polynomial $\Phi_n(x,y)\in \mathbb Z[x,y]$ such that $\Phi_n(x,j(\omega))=\phi_{n,\omega}(x)$. Applying a suitable substitution we obtain another polynomial $\Psi_n(x,y)\in \mathbb Z[x,y]$ satisfying for all $0\neq z \in \mathbb C$

  • $\Psi_n(z,z)=0$ is equivalent to $z=\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(M\omega)$ for some $M\in S(n,3)$ and $\omega\in H$.

Thus if $0\neq z \in \mathbb C$ is a root of $\Psi_n(x,x)=0$ then we must have for some $\omega$ and $M=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} r & s \\ 0 & t \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)\in S(n,3)$ \begin{equation} z=\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(M\omega) \end{equation} and consequently by the fourth paragraph \begin{equation} \frac{a\omega+b}{c\omega+d}=\frac{r\omega+s}{t} \end{equation} where $a,b,c,d$ are integers such that $ad-bc=1$ and $ab-ac+cd-a^2cd \equiv 0 \ (\textrm{mod}\ 3)$. Hence $\omega$ is a root of a quadratic equation with integral coefficients, and if $n$ is suitably chosen, then the middle coefficient will be divisible by $3$. Conversely if we can find $\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ and $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} r & s \\ 0 & t \end{smallmatrix} \bigr) $ with these properties, $\gamma_2(\omega)$ will be a root of $\Psi_n(x,x)=0$

On the other hand the roots of the equation \begin{equation} x^3-j(\omega)=0 \end{equation} are \begin{equation} \gamma_2(\omega),\ e^{-2\pi i/3}\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(\omega+1),\ e^{2\pi i/3}\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(\omega-1) \end{equation}

If we could guarantee that the only common root of $\Psi_n(x,x)$ and $x^3-j(\omega)$ is $\gamma_2(\omega)$, then we would know that $\gamma_2(\omega)$ and $j(\omega)$ had the same degree. But if $A$ is not divisible by $3$, $B$ is divisible by $3$ and \begin{equation} A\omega^2+B\omega+C=0,\ (A,B,C)=1. \end{equation} then it is easy to see that the numbers $\omega + 1$ and $\omega -1$ satisfy quadratic equations whose middle coefficients are not divisible by $3$. Therefore $\gamma_2(\omega)$ is the only common root and we are done.

Finally, my question is this: given $\omega\in H$ such that $\omega^2+3\omega+\frac{9-D}{4}=0$ where $D\equiv 5 \ (\textrm{mod} \ 8)$ and $D<0$ is not divisible by 3, how can I find $n\equiv -1 \ (\textrm{mod}\ 3)$ and $M\in S(n,3)$ such that $$A\omega=M\omega$$ holds for some $A=\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)\in\Gamma$ satisfying $ab-ac+cd-a^2cd \equiv 0 \ (\textrm{mod}\ 3)$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How can a cube root be real on the imaginary axis? $\endgroup$ – Laurent Moret-Bailly May 5 '18 at 11:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Laurent Moret-Bailly: The $j$-invariant is real on the imaginary axis, for example we have $j(i)=1728=12^3$. It turns out that the function $j$ has a holomorphic cube root. The function $\gamma_2$ is defined to be that cube root which takes real values on the imaginary axis. Thus we have for instance $\gamma_2(i)=12$. $\endgroup$ – Shimrod May 5 '18 at 12:42
  • $\begingroup$ D is positive or negative or it depends? $\endgroup$ – Luca Ghidelli May 6 '18 at 0:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Luca Ghidelli: The discriminant $D$ is always negative. $\endgroup$ – Shimrod May 6 '18 at 10:34
  • $\begingroup$ By the way, there's a "reason" that for any CM point with discriminant coprime to $3$ one can find an ${\rm SL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ orbit of $\omega$ that gives a solution to $j = x^{3}$ of degree $h(D)$. This is because the equation $j = x^{3}$ is the equation of the modular curve corresponding to the normalizer of a non-split Cartan subgroup modulo $3$. The normalizer of the split Cartan subgroup is contained in this, and an elliptic curve with CM by $\mathbb{Z}[\omega]$ will have mod $3$ image contained in one of these two if the discriminant is coprime to $3$. $\endgroup$ – Jeremy Rouse May 7 '18 at 15:17
3
$\begingroup$

Let $N=\frac {9-D}{4}$ and let $\bar\omega$ be the complex conjugate of $\omega$. In particular $\omega+\bar\omega = -3$ and $\omega\bar\omega=N$.

For every $A=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}a & b\\c&d\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)\in\Gamma$ we have that $ad=bc+1$, so $$A\omega = \frac{(a\omega +b)(c\bar\omega+d)}{(c\omega+d)(c\bar\omega+d)}=\frac{ac(\omega\bar\omega) +\omega + bc(\omega+\bar\omega)+bd}{c^2(\omega\bar\omega) +cd(\omega+\bar\omega)+d^2}=M\omega$$ with $M=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}r & s\\0&t\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ and $$\begin{aligned}r&=1 ,\\s&=bd-3bc+Nac , \\ t&=d^2-3cd+Nc^2.\end{aligned}$$

Of course we have $r>0$, $gcd(r,s,t)=1$ and $n=t$. We now show how to choose appropriate $a,b,c,d$ to fulfil all the other requirements. We will choose $a,b,c,d> 0$ to be positive integers.

Since the discriminant $\Delta=(-3)^2 - 4 N$ is negative, we have that $t>0$. Since $s=\frac b d t + \frac c d N$, we also have $s>0$.

If $N\equiv 1\pmod 3$ we choose $a\equiv -d\not\equiv 0\pmod 3$ and $b\equiv c\not\equiv 0\pmod 3$. If $N\equiv -1\pmod 3$, we choose $a\equiv -d\equiv 0\pmod 3$ and $b\equiv c\not\equiv 0\pmod 3$.

In this way, $n=t\equiv -1\pmod 3$, $s\equiv 0\pmod 3$ and $ab-ac+cd+a^2cd\equiv 0\pmod 3$.

Finally, the requirement $s=\frac b d t +\frac c d N< 3t$ is satisfied whenever $d$ is chosen sufficiently large, compared to $b,c,N$, subject to $ad=bc+1$ and all the conditions above.

Here is a choice of parameters that works, because $N$ is an integer and $N\geq 2$:

  • if $N\equiv 1\pmod 3$, choose $A= \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}1 & 1\\1&2\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ and $M= \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}1 & N-1\\0&N-2\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$;

  • if $N\equiv -1\pmod 3$, choose $A= \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}3 & 2\\4&3\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ and $M= \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}1 & 12N-18\\0&16N-27\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$.

A cool thing is that we can choose $A$ almost independently of $\omega$!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. This seems to work. Could you please explain why should $t>0$? $\endgroup$ – Shimrod May 6 '18 at 12:40
  • $\begingroup$ $t>0$ because it is a polynomial of degree 2 with negative discriminant. If you want, you can see it in one variable: t=c^2(x^2-3x+N) with x=d/c (a rational, hence real number). Now, y=x^2-3x+N is a parabola that doesn't cross the x-axis, so it has the graph strictly on the upper half plane. Moreover, if c is nonzero, c^2 is positive as well. So t is strictly positive. $\endgroup$ – Luca Ghidelli May 6 '18 at 13:12
  • $\begingroup$ Now I see that it is obvious, thank you. $\endgroup$ – Shimrod May 6 '18 at 14:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.