3
$\begingroup$

I have a question which is fairly elementary, but first I must provide relevant context. Without it, my question would seem rather arbitrary and scarcely interesting. Note also that my question can be answered without reading what follows.

Let $j(\omega)$ be the modular invariant, $\Gamma$ be the modular group and $H$ the upper half-plane. Define $\gamma_2(\omega)=\sqrt[3]{j(\omega)}$ using the cube root which is real on the imaginary axis.

Let $\tau\in H$ satisfy \begin{equation} A\tau^2+B\tau+C=0,\ (A,B,C)=1. \end{equation}

By Class field theory the value $j(\tau)$ is an algebraic integer of degree exactly $h(D)$, where $D=B^2-4AC$. Since $\gamma_2(\tau)^3-j(\tau)=0$ one would expect the degree of $\gamma_2(\tau)$ to be $3h(D)$. But it turns out that, if $(A,3)=1$ and $3\mid B$, the degree of $\gamma_2(\tau)$ is also $h(D)$.

Now I indicate how this result can be proved.

Set $\varepsilon=e^{-\frac{2\pi i}{3}}$. It can be shown that for $\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)\in\Gamma$ we have

\begin{equation} \gamma_2{\left(\frac{a\omega+b}{c\omega+d}\right)}=\varepsilon^{ab-ac+cd-a^2cd}\gamma_2(\omega). \end{equation} This implies that $\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(\tau)$ if and only if $A\omega=\tau$, with $A=\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)\in\Gamma$ satisfying $ab-ac+cd-a^2cd \equiv 0 \ (\textrm{mod}\ 3)$, except when $\omega \equiv e^{-\frac{2\pi i}{3}} \ (\textrm{mod}\ \Gamma)$, in which case $\gamma_2(\omega)=0$.

Next define \begin{equation} S(n,3)=\bigg\lbrace\begin{pmatrix} r & s\\ 0 & t \end{pmatrix}:rt=n,r>0,(r,s,t)=1,3\mid s,0\leq s <3t \bigg\rbrace. \end{equation} Let $\omega$ be in the upper half-plane $H$. Consider the polynomial \begin{equation} \phi_{n,\omega}(x)=\prod_{M\in S(n,3)}\left(x-\gamma_2(M\omega)\gamma_2(\omega)^{-n} \right). \end{equation} It takes some work to show that the coefficients of this polynomial are invariant under $\Gamma$, and therefore rational functions in $j(\omega)$. After additional work we conclude that they are in fact polynomials with integral coefficients. In this way we get a polynomial $\Phi_n(x,y)\in \mathbb Z[x,y]$ such that $\Phi_n(x,j(\omega))=\phi_{n,\omega}(x)$. Applying a suitable substitution we obtain another polynomial $\Psi_n(x,y)\in \mathbb Z[x,y]$ satisfying for all $0\neq z \in \mathbb C$

  • $\Psi_n(z,z)=0$ is equivalent to $z=\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(M\omega)$ for some $M\in S(n,3)$ and $\omega\in H$.

Thus if $0\neq z \in \mathbb C$ is a root of $\Psi_n(x,x)=0$ then we must have for some $\omega$ and $M=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} r & s \\ 0 & t \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)\in S(n,3)$ \begin{equation} z=\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(M\omega) \end{equation} and consequently by the fourth paragraph \begin{equation} \frac{a\omega+b}{c\omega+d}=\frac{r\omega+s}{t} \end{equation} where $a,b,c,d$ are integers such that $ad-bc=1$ and $ab-ac+cd-a^2cd \equiv 0 \ (\textrm{mod}\ 3)$. Hence $\omega$ is a root of a quadratic equation with integral coefficients, and if $n$ is suitably chosen, then the middle coefficient will be divisible by $3$. Conversely if we can find $\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)$ and $\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} r & s \\ 0 & t \end{smallmatrix} \bigr) $ with these properties, $\gamma_2(\omega)$ will be a root of $\Psi_n(x,x)=0$

On the other hand the roots of the equation \begin{equation} x^3-j(\omega)=0 \end{equation} are \begin{equation} \gamma_2(\omega),\ e^{-2\pi i/3}\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(\omega+1),\ e^{2\pi i/3}\gamma_2(\omega)=\gamma_2(\omega-1) \end{equation}

If we could guarantee that the only common root of $\Psi_n(x,x)$ and $x^3-j(\omega)$ is $\gamma_2(\omega)$, then we would know that $\gamma_2(\omega)$ and $j(\omega)$ had the same degree. But if $A$ is not divisible by $3$, $B$ is divisible by $3$ and \begin{equation} A\omega^2+B\omega+C=0,\ (A,B,C)=1. \end{equation} then it is easy to see that the numbers $\omega + 1$ and $\omega -1$ satisfy quadratic equations whose middle coefficients are not divisible by $3$. Therefore $\gamma_2(\omega)$ is the only common root and we are done.

Finally, my question is this: given $\omega\in H$ such that $\omega^2+3\omega+\frac{9-D}{4}=0$ where $D\equiv 5 \ (\textrm{mod} \ 8)$ and $D<0$ is not divisible by 3, how can I find $n\equiv -1 \ (\textrm{mod}\ 3)$ and $M\in S(n,3)$ such that $$A\omega=M\omega$$ holds for some $A=\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix} \bigr)\in\Gamma$ satisfying $ab-ac+cd-a^2cd \equiv 0 \ (\textrm{mod}\ 3)$?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ How can a cube root be real on the imaginary axis? $\endgroup$ Commented May 5, 2018 at 11:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Laurent Moret-Bailly: The $j$-invariant is real on the imaginary axis, for example we have $j(i)=1728=12^3$. It turns out that the function $j$ has a holomorphic cube root. The function $\gamma_2$ is defined to be that cube root which takes real values on the imaginary axis. Thus we have for instance $\gamma_2(i)=12$. $\endgroup$
    – Shimrod
    Commented May 5, 2018 at 12:42
  • $\begingroup$ D is positive or negative or it depends? $\endgroup$ Commented May 6, 2018 at 0:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Luca Ghidelli: The discriminant $D$ is always negative. $\endgroup$
    – Shimrod
    Commented May 6, 2018 at 10:34
  • $\begingroup$ By the way, there's a "reason" that for any CM point with discriminant coprime to $3$ one can find an ${\rm SL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ orbit of $\omega$ that gives a solution to $j = x^{3}$ of degree $h(D)$. This is because the equation $j = x^{3}$ is the equation of the modular curve corresponding to the normalizer of a non-split Cartan subgroup modulo $3$. The normalizer of the split Cartan subgroup is contained in this, and an elliptic curve with CM by $\mathbb{Z}[\omega]$ will have mod $3$ image contained in one of these two if the discriminant is coprime to $3$. $\endgroup$ Commented May 7, 2018 at 15:17

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Let $N=\frac {9-D}{4}$ and let $\bar\omega$ be the complex conjugate of $\omega$. In particular $\omega+\bar\omega = -3$ and $\omega\bar\omega=N$.

For every $A=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}a & b\\c&d\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)\in\Gamma$ we have that $ad=bc+1$, so $$A\omega = \frac{(a\omega +b)(c\bar\omega+d)}{(c\omega+d)(c\bar\omega+d)}=\frac{ac(\omega\bar\omega) +\omega + bc(\omega+\bar\omega)+bd}{c^2(\omega\bar\omega) +cd(\omega+\bar\omega)+d^2}=M\omega$$ with $M=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}r & s\\0&t\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ and $$\begin{aligned}r&=1 ,\\s&=bd-3bc+Nac , \\ t&=d^2-3cd+Nc^2.\end{aligned}$$

Of course we have $r>0$, $gcd(r,s,t)=1$ and $n=t$. We now show how to choose appropriate $a,b,c,d$ to fulfil all the other requirements. We will choose $a,b,c,d> 0$ to be positive integers.

Since the discriminant $\Delta=(-3)^2 - 4 N$ is negative, we have that $t>0$. Since $s=\frac b d t + \frac c d N$, we also have $s>0$.

If $N\equiv 1\pmod 3$ we choose $a\equiv -d\not\equiv 0\pmod 3$ and $b\equiv c\not\equiv 0\pmod 3$. If $N\equiv -1\pmod 3$, we choose $a\equiv -d\equiv 0\pmod 3$ and $b\equiv c\not\equiv 0\pmod 3$.

In this way, $n=t\equiv -1\pmod 3$, $s\equiv 0\pmod 3$ and $ab-ac+cd+a^2cd\equiv 0\pmod 3$.

Finally, the requirement $s=\frac b d t +\frac c d N< 3t$ is satisfied whenever $d$ is chosen sufficiently large, compared to $b,c,N$, subject to $ad=bc+1$ and all the conditions above.

Here is a choice of parameters that works, because $N$ is an integer and $N\geq 2$:

  • if $N\equiv 1\pmod 3$, choose $A= \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}1 & 1\\1&2\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ and $M= \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}1 & N-1\\0&N-2\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$;

  • if $N\equiv -1\pmod 3$, choose $A= \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}3 & 2\\4&3\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ and $M= \bigl(\begin{smallmatrix}1 & 12N-18\\0&16N-27\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$.

A cool thing is that we can choose $A$ almost independently of $\omega$!

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. This seems to work. Could you please explain why should $t>0$? $\endgroup$
    – Shimrod
    Commented May 6, 2018 at 12:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $t>0$ because it is a polynomial of degree 2 with negative discriminant. If you want, you can see it in one variable: t=c^2(x^2-3x+N) with x=d/c (a rational, hence real number). Now, y=x^2-3x+N is a parabola that doesn't cross the x-axis, so it has the graph strictly on the upper half plane. Moreover, if c is nonzero, c^2 is positive as well. So t is strictly positive. $\endgroup$ Commented May 6, 2018 at 13:12
  • $\begingroup$ Now I see that it is obvious, thank you. $\endgroup$
    – Shimrod
    Commented May 6, 2018 at 14:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .