1
$\begingroup$

I saw a proof that $|p_n - li^{-1}(n)| \leq n e^{-c \sqrt{\ln(n)}} $, without saying anything about $c$ !

My questions is, what the explicit value of $c$ ??

It just says for some number $c$ without giving any information about $c$ !

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ What's $p_n$ and $li^{-1} (n)$? $\endgroup$
    – Pat Devlin
    Jan 30, 2017 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ Presumably the $n$th prime and the inverse function of $li$, the logarithmic integral: $li(x)=\int_2^x 1/\log x\,dx$. $\endgroup$ Jan 30, 2017 at 23:20
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Where did you see a proof? $\endgroup$
    – Stopple
    Jan 30, 2017 at 23:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Don't close this question as I gave a nice answer to it :-) $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Jan 31, 2017 at 5:58

1 Answer 1

18
$\begingroup$

An explicit version of the Prime Number Theorem required here is Theorem 1.12 on Page 42 of Dusart's thesis. In particular, it follows from this theorem that $$ |\pi(x)-\mathrm{Li}(x)|<x e^{-0.32\sqrt{\ln x}},\qquad x\geq 59. $$ Using Kadiri's explicit zero-free region, Trudgian sharpened this result to $$ |\pi(x)-\mathrm{Li}(x)|<x e^{-0.39\sqrt{\ln x}},\qquad x\geq 229.$$

Strictly speaking, these inequalities do not answer the original question. On the other hand, applying either of them at $x=p_n$, one obtains a similar bound for $|n-\mathrm{Li}(p_n)|$ in terms of $n$ (using a crude but concrete Chebyshev type bound $p_n\asymp n\log n$), and then applying $\mathrm{Li}^{-1}$ to both $n$ and $\mathrm{Li}(p_n)$, one concludes an analogous bound for $|\mathrm{Li}^{-1}(n)-p_n|$.

Added. See arXiv:2206.12557 and the references therein for even sharper results.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.