1
$\begingroup$

I would like to know more about divisibility among power-divisor functions. Put $\sigma_k(n) = \sum_{d \mid n} d^k$ for all positive integers $k$ and $n$.

My question here is : for which positive integers $x$ and $y$ do we have that $\sigma_x(n) $ divides $\sigma_y(n) $ for all $n$?

EDIT01 : For instance, this is true for $y = 11$ and $x = 1$, at least for $n$ from $2$ to $1000$ (see this Wolfram|Alpha calculation). Could it be that the solutions are always of the form $y=11x$?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ See my answer to mathoverflow.net/questions/227458 , and consider what happens there if you replace $p$ by $p^x$. If $n$ does not have a special form, I doubt you will improve much on that answer. Gerhard "Welcomes You To Try, Naturally" Paseman, 2016.01.22. $\endgroup$ – Gerhard Paseman Jan 23 '16 at 0:58
  • $\begingroup$ @GerhardPaseman, thank you for this , look the result in Edit :01 $\endgroup$ – zeraoulia rafik Jan 24 '16 at 2:28
  • $\begingroup$ @L SPICE ,thank you very much for your edit $\endgroup$ – zeraoulia rafik Jan 24 '16 at 3:44
  • $\begingroup$ The linked result in the comment above will show that for prime powers of the form n=p^10 that sigma_11(n) mod sigma(n) is nonzero. See if you can find other powers e such that sigma_11(p^e) mod sigma(p^e) is nonzero. Gerhard "Pondering What One Read Helps" Paseman, 2016.01.23 $\endgroup$ – Gerhard Paseman Jan 24 '16 at 4:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The most recent edit to the problem makes the problem clear and easier to solve (and, in my opinion, less appropriate for this forum). Another version, which is likely to be nore interesting and appropriate and belongs in a separate question: Given some predicate P(n,x,y) of mathematical interest, for which triples of positive integers n,x, and y do we have [P(n,x,y) and sigma_x(n) divides sigma_y(n)] ? Even if P is always true, that question would be of interest and likely hard. Gerhard "Always Looking For Quality Improvements" Paseman, 2016.01.24. $\endgroup$ – Gerhard Paseman Jan 24 '16 at 20:02
0
$\begingroup$

The answer is when $x=y$. Using primes $p$ for $n$, one sees that $y$ has to be an odd multiple of $x$, say $y=kx$ for $k$ odd. Now if $k>1$, use $n= p^{k-1}$, set $q=p^x$, and note that $\sigma_x(n)$ divides $q^k - 1$, so $\sigma_y(n)$ is $k$ mod $\sigma_x(n)$. So we do not have (for $k > 1$) $\sigma_x(n)$ dividing $\sigma_{kx}(n)$ for all $n$.

Gerhard "Has Likely Revealed Some Folklore" Paseman, 2016.01.23.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer, I think for k=p >7 holds (k must be a prime number ) $\endgroup$ – zeraoulia rafik Jan 24 '16 at 16:28
  • $\begingroup$ Ok. Try n=59049, x=1, and k=y=11. Gerhard "Opinion Often Resistant To Fact" Paseman, 2016.01.24 $\endgroup$ – Gerhard Paseman Jan 24 '16 at 16:51
  • $\begingroup$ nice counter example , then it fails for n >1000 $\endgroup$ – zeraoulia rafik Jan 24 '16 at 17:01
  • $\begingroup$ do you meant ,it can be holds for all n execept the form wich gives k mod sigma_x(n) $\endgroup$ – zeraoulia rafik Jan 24 '16 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ I mean that the linked relation gives you some idea of, given n, when sigma(n) divides sigma_y(n). Although you can extend this to sigma_x dividing sigma_y somewhat, it highly depends on n and not just on the exponents of its prime factorization. Gerhard "Leaving Good Parts For You" Paseman, 2016.01.24. $\endgroup$ – Gerhard Paseman Jan 24 '16 at 18:12

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.