6
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator\Div{Div}$Edit: The correct formulation of the vector space $S(X)$ which is defined in this question is the following:$$S(X)=\{Y\in \chi^{\infty}(M)\mid X.\omega(X,Y)=(1/n)\Div(X)\omega(X,Y)\}.$$ This mistake (typos)had been occurred in remark 6, page 7 of Taghavi - On periodic solutions of Liénard equations.


Let $(M,\omega)$ be a $2n$ dimensional symplectic manifold and $X$ a smooth vector field on $M$. Consider the following subvector space of $\chi^{\infty}(M)$: $$S(X)=\{Y\in \chi^{\infty}(M)\mid X.\omega(X,Y)=n\Div(X)\omega(X,Y)\}.$$ Here $\Div$ is the divergence corresponding to the volume form $\omega^{n}$

This vector space contains the Lie algebra $C(X)=\{Y\in \chi^{\infty}(M)\mid [X,Y]=0\}$. It also contains the Lie algebra $M(X)=\{fX\mid f\in C^{\infty}(M)\}$.

Note that, according to the above definition of $S(X)$, the inclusion $C(X)\subset S(X)$ sensitively depends on the scalar $n$. If we replace $n$ by another scalar, this inclusion is no longer true. (Nevertheless the inclusion $M(X)\subset S(X)$ is not sensitive to this scalar, that is, it is valid for every other scalar.)

Questions:

What other interesting Lie algebras are contained in $S(X)$?

Is $S(X)$ a Lie subalgebra of $\chi^{\infty}(M)$? If the answer is yes, what are some interesting ideals of $S(X)$? If the answer is no, is the Lie algebra generated by $S(X)$ equal to the Lie algebra generated by $C(X)$ and $M(X)$?

Motivated by the usual dynamical question "Is the triviality of centralizer a generic situation?", we ask: Is it true to say that for a generic vector field $X$ we have $S(X)=M(X)$?

Note: At the international workshop on dynamical system in ICTP, Italy, 2001, I heard from a specialist of dynamical system that "the centralizer problem has various aspects both in discrete and continuous dynamics, but I think that the symplectic version of this problem is interesting and unknown". So this my post is a try for a possible symplectization of "centralizer problem".

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If there is an error in the arXiv paper, then why not update to fix it? $\endgroup$ – LSpice Sep 17 '18 at 16:00
  • $\begingroup$ @LSpice For the moment I do not access to the Latex file of that paper but I can write a letter to the journal which published that paper and inform them of this error. Any way I thank you for your attention to my post and for your suggestion. $\endgroup$ – Ali Taghavi Sep 17 '18 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ You can download the source from the arXiv: arxiv.org/e-print/math/0409594 . (At least for me, it comes without an extension; but it is a tar'd gzip'd file, and can be opened as such.) $\endgroup$ – LSpice Sep 17 '18 at 23:30
2
$\begingroup$

For $n>1$, and the standard symplectic structure $\omega=\sum dx_i\wedge dy_i$ of $\mathbb{R}^{2n}=\{(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n,y_1,y_2,\ldots,y_n)\}$ and for the vector field $X=\partial/\partial_{x_1}$ it is easy to observe that the following vector space is not a Lie algebra, since $Div(\partial/\partial_{x_1})=0$

$$S_{\lambda}(X)=\left\{Y\in \chi^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{2n})\mid X.\omega(X,Y)=\lambda Div(X)\omega(X,Y)\right \}$$

But for $n=1$ and $\lambda=1$ it is always a Lie algebra. In fact we have the following obvious fact:

Obvious Fact: Let $(M,\omega)$ be a $2$- dimensional symplectic manifold(i.e: $\omega$ is a volume form on $M$) and $X$ is a vector field on $M$. Then the vector space $$S(X)=\left\{Y\in \chi^{\infty}(M)\mid X.\omega(X,Y)= Div(X)\omega(X,Y)\right \}$$ is a Lie algebra. Moreover it contains the centralizer $C(X) $

Proof: We apply the well known formula $$d\alpha(X,Y)=X.\alpha(Y)-Y.\alpha(X)-\alpha([X,Y])$$ to $\alpha=i_X(\omega)$. So we conclude that the $S(X)$ in the Obvious Fact is equal to $\{Y\in \chi^{\infty}(M)\mid \omega(X,[X,Y])=0\}$. The later is obviously a Lie algebra containing the centralizer $C(X).$

Remark: For a symplectic manifold $N$ of arbitrary dimension $2n$ it can be shown that the centralizer $C(X)$ of a vector field $X$ is contained in the following vector space:

$$\left\{Y\in \chi^{\infty}(N)\mid X.\omega(X,Y)=(1/n) Div(X)\omega(X,Y)\right \}$$

So in the question of this post one should replace $n$ by $1/n$.

Proof of Remark:

Assume that $[X,Y]=0$. We prove that $X.\omega(X,Y)=(1/n)Div X\omega(X,Y)$. But we need only to prove this formula at all points $p\in N$ with $\omega(X(p),Y(p))\neq 0$. For any such a point $p$, there exist locally a $2$ dimensional symplectic manifold $M$ containing $p$ such that $X,Y$ are tangent to $M$. Now we apply the Obvious Fact above to $M$. We have $X.\omega(X,Y)=Div_{\omega}X.\omega(X,Y) $, where $Div_{\omega} X$ is the divergence of $X$ as a vector field on $M$ with the volume form $\omega$. On the other hand $Div X=(1/n)Div_{\omega} X$ where $Div X$ is the divergence of $X$ as a vector field on the whole manifold $N$ with volume form $\omega^n$.This completes the proof of "Remark".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.