4
$\begingroup$

Define $W(X,Y) = \{ u \in L^2(0,T;X) \mid u' \in L^2(0,T;Y)\}$ where $u'$ is the usual weak derivative.

Let $V \subset H \subset V^*$ be a Hilbert triple. If $u \in W(V,V)$ (so $$u \in L^2(0,T;V) \quad\text{with}\quad u' \in L^2(0,T;V)$$), then is $$\lVert{u}\rVert_{C^0([0,T];V)} \leq C\left(\lVert{u}\rVert_{L^2(0,T;V)} + \lVert{u'}\rVert_{L^2(0,T;H)}\right)?$$ (Notice the norm on $u'$ is taken with respect the weaker space $H$).

We know that $$W(V,V) \hookrightarrow C([0,T];V).$$ So the quantities in the desired inequality make sense, but does the inequality hold?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It sounds like you should probably look for references on vector-valued Sobolev embedding theorems. $\endgroup$ – Christopher A. Wong Feb 19 '14 at 20:44
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristopherA.Wong Indeed. I searched with no luck. $\endgroup$ – maximumtag Feb 20 '14 at 10:40
  • $\begingroup$ Try looking at Wloka's "Partial Differential Equations" somewhere around page 390 or so. What is the motivation of the question, i.e. what happens if the answer is yes/no? I think it should be relatively easy to design examples showing that both the embedding $W(V,H) \hookrightarrow C([0,T];V)$ and the corresponding norm inequality are not generally true. Without motivation, I am not sure if it is worthwhile bothering. $\endgroup$ – TaQ Feb 20 '14 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ @TaQ The motivation is my first question (I will edit my post to remove the question about the embedding. I think you're right in that the embedding is not true). But maybe you're right also about my norm-inequality question.. Anyway the motivation for that is difficult to explain but I need it to apply a Minty-Browder monotone trick. $\endgroup$ – maximumtag Feb 20 '14 at 20:20
3
$\begingroup$

As mentioned by @TaQ, the embedding $W(V,H) \hookrightarrow C([0,T];V)$ is, in general, not true. However, if your estimate would be true, you can extend the embedding operator from the dense subspace $H^1(0,T;V)$ to $L^2(0,T;V) \cap H^1(0,T; H) = W(V,H)$. This yields a contradiction.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think you mean furthermore rather than however $\endgroup$ – username Feb 21 '14 at 12:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.