5
$\begingroup$

A Lie group $G$ can be considered as a reductive homogeneous space in at least two different ways; $G/\{e\}$ and $G\times G/G^*$. In the first case, the canonical connection associated with the reductive decomposition has zero curvature and non-zero torsion (if $G$ isn't abelian). This connection coincides with the Cartan (-)-connection. In the second case, the canonical connection has zero torsion and generally nonzero curvature.

Can we express a Lie group as a reductive homogeneous space for which the canonical connection has both nonzero curvature and torsion? We could take as our connection a combination of the two connections described above. However, how do we know that this will be a canonical connection with respect to some reductive decomposition?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Apparently there's one more case: mathoverflow.net/questions/126673/the-connection-on-a-lie-group $\endgroup$ Feb 5, 2014 at 1:12
  • $\begingroup$ @QiaochuYuan Could you elaborate? $\endgroup$ Feb 5, 2014 at 2:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There are some missing assumptions on $G$ for last sentence in the opening paragraph to be correct. The Levi-Civita connection is by definition a metric, torsion-free connection and the statement the OP writes is true for Lie groups with a bi-invariant metric. (Most Lie groups, by any measure, do not have such metrics.) $\endgroup$ Feb 5, 2014 at 11:20
  • $\begingroup$ @José You can ignore the reference to the Levi-Civita connection because it's not relevant to my question. Simply put, I'm asking what connections on a Lie group are canonical w.r.t. some reductive decomposition. $\endgroup$ Feb 5, 2014 at 21:56

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

(this is also related to The (-)-Connection on a Lie Group, Metric Connections on a Lie Group)

If we want to speak about bi-invariant metric connections,then we cannot drop the assumption of compactness. Actually, a compact connected Lie group $G$ with a bi-invariant Riemannian metric $\rho$ can be viewed as a Riemannian symmetric space of the form $((G\times G)/{\rm diag}(G), \rho)$. If this Lie group is in addition simple, then it can be considered as a compact, isotropy irreducible, Riemmanian symmetric space, the so-called of Type II in Helgason's book. The classical Cartan-Schouten theorem is about a compact simple Lie group $G$, and it states that the unique flat bi-invariant metric connections on $G$ are the so-called +1 and -1 connections, say $\nabla^{\pm 1}$. They have non-zero (skew)torsion $T^{\pm 1}(X, Y)=\pm [X, Y]$. Moreover, $\nabla^{\pm 1}T^{\pm 1}=0$. In general, one can construct a 1-dimensional family $\{\nabla^{t} : t\in R\}$ of bi-invariant metric canonical connections on $G$, which joins the Levi-Civita connection and the $\pm 1$-connections. This family occurs by a reductive decomposition $\frak{g}\oplus\frak{g}=\Delta_{\frak{g}}\oplus{\frak{m}}_{t}$, which generalizes (and includes) the classical Cartan decomposition of $G$ (the latter induces the L-C connection on $G$). For example, see Section 4/page 8 of the following paper

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.5044.pdf

Notice that by the term canonical, we usually mean these (bi-invariant) connections on $G\cong (G\times G)/{\rm diag}(G)$, say $\nabla$, for which the $\nabla$-parallel tensor fields are exactly the $(G\times G)$-invariant tensor fields.

This 1-parameter family of bi-invariant metric connections on $G$, has non-trivial (parallel) skew-torsion (except the trivial case of the Levi-Civita connection) and only the values $\pm 1$ give rise to flat metric connections. For all the other values of the parameter $t$, the associated curvature is non-zero.

An easy way to compute the curvature and the torsion (or its covariant derivative) is by using the correspondence between bi-invariant affine connections on $G$ and bilinear maps $\lambda : \frak{g}\times\frak{g}\to\frak{g}$ which are ${\rm Ad}(G)$-equivariant, i.e. $\lambda({\rm Ad}(g)X, {\rm Ad}(g)Y)={\rm Ad}(g)\lambda(X, Y)$ for any $X, Y\in\frak{g}$ and $g\in G$. Then

$$R(X, Y)=[\Lambda(X), \Lambda(Y)]-\Lambda([X, Y])$$ $$T(X, Y)=\Lambda(X)Y-\Lambda(Y)X-[X, Y],$$ where $\Lambda :\frak{g}\to{\rm End}(\frak{g})$ is the equivariant endomorphism associated to $\lambda$, i.e. $\Lambda(X)Y=\lambda(X, Y)$. It is easy to see that $\lambda$ induces a bi-invariant metric connection on $G$, if and only if $\Lambda(X)\in\frak{so}(\frak{g})$ for any $X\in\frak{g}$, i.e. $$\langle \Lambda(X)Y, Z\rangle+\langle Y, \Lambda(X)Z\rangle =0 \quad \forall \ X, Y, Z\in\frak{g}.$$

For example, the 1-parameter family of bi-invariant canonical metric connections on $G$ is induced by the bilinear map $\lambda(X, Y)=((1-t)/2)[X, Y]$ (up to scalar and sign), but it depends how we consider the reductive decomposition $\frak{g}\oplus\frak{g}=\Delta_{\frak{g}}\oplus{\frak{m}}_{t}$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ By the canonical connection I mean the canonical connection of the second kind in the sense of Nomizu. $\endgroup$ Jul 8, 2014 at 3:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.