A Lie group has three standard Cartan connections; the ()connection, the (0)connection, and the (+)connection. The (0)connection is LeviCivita with the associated metric the biinvariant metric. The other two connections aren't LeviCivita due to the presence of torsion. However, there's nothing to stop them a priori from being metric connections. My question is; are the minus and plus connections compatible with the biinvariant metric? This seems reasonable but I can't find a reference.

$\begingroup$ 1) I don't know what the +/ connections are, and I suspect I'm not the only one. Perhaps you could provide definitions? 2) Have you tried to work it out from scratch? It should all reduce to a calculation involving the group and Lie algebra at the origin. $\endgroup$ – Deane Yang Jan 27 '12 at 7:42

2$\begingroup$ The +//0 terminology is used in section 11 of Nomizu's paper "Invariant affine connections on homogeneous spaces" where he attributes the distinction, and possibly also the notation, to Cartan (I've not followed the references). A left invariant affine connection is determined by specifying a bilinear mapping from the Lie algebra to itself. As one takes as this bilinear mapping respectively minus the Lie bracket, the Lie bracket, or half the Lie bracket one gets the /+/0 connection. $\endgroup$ – Dan Fox Jan 27 '12 at 8:11

$\begingroup$ Kobayashi and Numizu also mention these connections briefly in Chapter X (vol.2). They reference Cartan and Schouten. $\endgroup$ – Peter Dalakov Jan 27 '12 at 12:57

2$\begingroup$ You should be careful to specify which Lie groups you mean. Not all Lie groups carry biinvariant metrics (of any signature). Thus, for example, the connected, nonabelian Lie group of dimension 2 does not have such a metric (or even a biinvariant volume form, for that matter). In this example, the $(0)$connection does not preserve any metric. As Élie Cartan remarked when he defined these connections, the $(+)$ and $()$ connections on any Lie group are flat, so they each necessarily preserve (many) metrics on the group. If the $(0)$connection preserves a metric, it is biinvariant. $\endgroup$ – Robert Bryant Jan 27 '12 at 21:15

$\begingroup$ Good point Robert. If I understand you correctly, you're saying that, in general, Cartan connections need not be metric connections. $\endgroup$ – Oliver Jones Jan 27 '12 at 21:35
Yes.
Let $\nabla$ be an arbitrary connection on the tangent bundle of a Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$. The standard trick for expressing the LeviCivita connection in terms of $g$ gives you, for any 3 vector fields $X$, $Y$, $Z$: $$Xg(Y,Z)+ Yg(Z,X) Zg(X,Y)= N(X,Y,Z) $$ $$+ g(T(X,Z),Y)+ g(T(Y,Z),X) g(T(X,Y),Z) $$ $$ +2 g(\nabla_X Y,Z) g([X,Y],Z) + g([X,Z],Y) + g([Y,Z],X),$$
where $$ T(X,Y)=\nabla_X Y \nabla_Y X [X,Y]$$ is the torsion of $\nabla$ and $$ N(X,Y,Z)= \nabla_Xg(Y,Z)+ \nabla_Yg(Z,X)\nabla_Zg(X,Y). $$ This is the "nonmetricity": $N=0\Leftrightarrow \nabla g=0$.
Now, turning to the case at hand: we define the $\pm$ and $0$ connections by $$ (\nabla_X Y)_e=\epsilon [X,Y],$$ $ \epsilon = 1, 0, \frac{1}{2}$ respectively, so the torsion is $$T(X,Y) = (2\epsilon 1)[X,Y]= \pm[X,Y]\textrm{ or } 0, $$ hence the names of the connections. But then you get $$ 0 = N(X,Y,Z) 2\epsilon\left[ g([Z,Y],X) + g(Y,[Z,X]) \right],$$ and the second summand is zero due to biinvariance, so $N=0$.
If I understand correctly, the answer is Yes.
the +//0 connections can be defined by, if $X,Y$ is the left invariant vector $$\nabla_{X}Y=a[X,Y]$$ where $a=1,1,0$.
The connection is metric for left invariant metric iff $$0=\langle\nabla_{X}Y,Z\rangle+\langle Y,\nabla_{X}Z\rangle.$$
This is trival for the biinvariant metric.

$\begingroup$ Thanks Shu. But as Robert pointed out, I had implicitly assumed the existence of a biinvariant metric. $\endgroup$ – Oliver Jones Jan 27 '12 at 21:39