3
$\begingroup$

I have obtained as the expression for some quantity the following gargantuan formula:

$$ \frac{k^8 + 3k^7 + 8k^6 + 3k^5 - 16k^4 - 32k^3 + 63k^2 - 34k + 6}{k^6 + 3k^5 + 6k^4 - 24k^2 + 21k - 5}$$.

What I really need is a (very) good lower bound on it, that will hopefully be a more manageable expression.

Is there a systematic way of finding such bounds?

The bound needs to be valid only on $[5,\infty]$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ $k$ is in $\mathbb{R}$? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 11:29
  • $\begingroup$ this expression ranges from $-\infty$ to $\infty$ (for real $k$, and also for real positive $k$), so there is no lower bound. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 11:31
  • $\begingroup$ @JosephO'Rourke Yes. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 11:43
  • $\begingroup$ @CarloBeenakker Sure, that's why I specified in my P.S. that I need actually a "local bound". I'll edit to make this point more prominent. Thanks. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 11:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As for a systematic way, your question reminds me of the problem of finding surrogate functions. A surrogate function is a function approximating the original one but cheaper to compute. $\endgroup$
    – Waldemar
    Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 12:22

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

$$k^2+1.98-2.8/k$$

lower bound, error $<0.02$ for all $k>5$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ This looks great, but now I am curious - how did you obtain this result? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 13:42
  • $\begingroup$ from the large-$k$ expansion $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 13:46
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean the Taylor series? Or something else? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 13:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Taylor series around $1/k=0$ (it works because 1/5 is small enough respect to unity) $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 14:40
2
$\begingroup$

The function blows up at approximately $-2.6$ and $+0.5$ and $+0.7$, and otherwise looks something like a parabola. It is unclear what is meant by a "lower bound" for such a function.
     FelixPlot
     FelxiPlot01

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Suppose we zoom in on $k\geq 5$ - can you suggest an adequate bound in that case? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 11:45
  • $\begingroup$ @FelixGoldberg: Well, then the lower bound is just the value of the expression at $k=5$, which is $\frac{373393}{14125} \approx 26.4$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ I want a bound which is also a function of $k$... $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 12:07
  • $\begingroup$ @FelixGoldberg: I'm sorry, Felix, we are talking past one another. Your function is monotonically increasing $k \ge 5$. I am not sure what it means to express this as a function of $k$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 12:33
  • $\begingroup$ Now I see, from Waldemar's comment and Carlo's answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24, 2013 at 13:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.