For $m\in \mathbb{N}$ and $a=(a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_{m}) \in \mathbb{R}^{m+1}$, consider the polynomial $P_{a}$ defined by $$ P_{a} (x):= a_0 + a_1 x^2 + \ldots + a_{m}x^{2m}\text{, for $x \in \mathbb{R}$.} $$ Then there is $C_m >0$ such that for every $a \in \mathbb{R}^{m+1}$, we have $$ \int_{[0,1]} P_{a}(x)^2 dx \geq C_m \|a\|^2, $$ where $\|\cdot\|$ is the standard Euclidean norm. The existence of $C_m$ is guaranteed by the following compactness argument. Define the (continuous) function $\phi : \mathbb{R}^{m+1} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ by $$ \phi(a) := \int_{[0,1]} P_{a}(x)^2 dx. $$ Then for $r \in \mathbb{R}$, $\phi(ra)= r^2 \phi(a)$ and hence $\phi(a)= \|a\|^2 \phi(a/\|a\|)$. So $C_m$ can be taken to be $C_m = \min_{v \in \mathbb{S}^m} \phi(v)$.
My questions are the following:
Can we get a lower bound for $C_m$ (in terms of $m$)?
Do we know which value of $a \in \mathbb{S}^{m}$ minimizes the function $\phi$?
My guess is that the minimizer $a_{\text{min}}$ must have coordinates whose signs alternate so that it minimizes the value of $a_0 + a_1 x^2 + \ldots + a_{m}x^{2m}$, but $a_j$'s should not have the same absolute value. Rather, they should increase in some way.
Thanks!