7
$\begingroup$

For a closed hyperbolic $3$-manifold $M$, the Chern-Simons invariant $CS(M)$ can be defined as an element of $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$. When $M$ is cusped it can still be defined, but is now only defined modulo $1/2$, i.e. as an element of $\mathbb R / \frac{1}{2}\mathbb Z$. (This is mentioned here.)

In the cusped case, is there some extra data that lets us refine $CS(M)$ to an element of $\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$? Maybe something like a choice of class in $H^1(M, \mathbb Z / 2\mathbb Z)$? I'm particularly interested in the case of $M = S^3 \setminus K$ a knot complement.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Remark 7.2 in Christian's paper suggests that for the choice of a lift of the discrete-faithful $PSL_2(\mathbb{C})$ representation to $SL_2(\mathbb{C})$, there ought to be a lift of the Chern-Simons invariant to $\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$. As he points out, this is equivalent to the choice of a spin structure (which is only a torsor over $H^1(M;\mathbb{Z}/2)$). This should be sandwiched in the diagram on p. 30:

$\require{AMScd}$

$$\begin{CD} H_3(SL_2(\mathbb{C}),P) @>>> H_3(SL_2(\mathbb{C}),\pm P) @>>> H_3(PSL_2(\mathbb{C}),P) \\ @V V V @V VV @V VV \\ \mathbb{C /4\pi^2 Z} @>>> \mathbb{C /2\pi^2 Z} @>>> \mathbb{C /\pi^2 Z}. \end{CD}$$

See also the discussion on p. 2, paragraph 2 to see why I think this normalization corresponds to the normalization given in your question.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.