2
$\begingroup$

Let $f:E\rightarrow F$ be a map between Banach spaces E and F; E finite dimensional (>0) and F infinite dimensional. Let $F$ be equipped with its weak topology and suppose that $f$ is strong-weak continuous.

Under what additional conditions can we guarantee that $\operatorname{span}(f(E))$ is a finite-dimensional subspace of F?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ For linear maps this is trivial and for non-linear maps this seems to be hopeless. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 10:17
  • $\begingroup$ @JochenWengenroth The first part I also noticed (obv. from splitting lemma) and I expect the second may follow for weak-strong continuous maps which are sufficiently Frechet differentiable.. $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 11:24
  • $\begingroup$ @Wasserstein'sApprentice: Just curious: what do you mean by "splitting lemma" in this context?) $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 11:58
  • $\begingroup$ I mean, the linear algebraic splitting lemma to infer that the image of $f$ (if linear) is a finite-dimensional subspace of its codomain; then you use the fact that maps between finite-dimensional linear spaces are (weakly) continuous...so any linear map is strong-weakly continuous and has finite dimensional image $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 12:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JochenGlueck Fair enough; I was just having fun with over-powered ways to show simple things (like just keeping track of the basis of the image under the linear map) $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 14:45

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Just to give an example on how weird this can become: take $E = \mathbb{R}$ and $F = \ell^2$ with standard Hilbert basis $e_0 e_1, e_2, \ldots$. Then take a smooth bump function $\chi \in C^\infty(\mathbb{R})$ with support in the unit interval and, say $\chi(1/2) = 1$ to make things non-trivial.

Define the highly non-linear but smooth as smooth can be map \begin{equation} f(t) = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \chi(t-n) e_n \end{equation} Then the span of the image contains the Hilbert basis...

As a slight variation one can als consider a holomorphic example, e.g. by \begin{equation} g(z) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{z^n}{n!} e_n \end{equation} Since the $e_n$ are unit vectors, this series is absolutely convergent for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$. It is holomorphic as a vector-valued function: here weakly coincides with strongly anyway, but this can also to be seen elementary. Now the derivatives at $0$ are the basis vectors again, so there is no finite-dimensional subspace and no open neighbourhood $U$ of $0$ containing $f(U)$: otherwise the derivatives would be in this subspace...

Maybe this example is a bit more illustrative since the first one has the feature that locally in $t$ the image is contained in finite-dimensional subspaces. This is not the case with $g$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I don't know how to formalize my intuition; but your comment "highly-nonlinear" really hits the point. Is there a (standard?) way of measuring how "far" a function is from being linear (possibly in terms of its dimension dilation)? $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 11:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ hmmm... Here I have no idea how to quantify "highly non-linear". It is smooth but non-analytic. But there are also holomorphic examples, I will update $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 13:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .