2
$\begingroup$

For a prime $p$ and $a_1,\dotsc,a_n\in\mathbb F_p^\times$, consider the system of equations $$ \begin{cases} \begin{align} a_1 + \dotsb + a_n &= 0 \\ a_1x_1 + \dotsb + a_nx_n &= 0 \\ \qquad &\ \vdots \\ a_1x_1^K + \dotsb + a_nx_n^K &= 0 \end{align} \end{cases} $$ How large can $K$ be given that this system has a solution in the variables $x_1,\dotsc,x_n\in\mathbb F_p^\times$?

By the Chevalley–Warning theorem, if $n>K(K+1)/2$, then there are solutions with at least some of the variables distinct from $0$. Is it true, say, that if $K>C\sqrt n$ with a suitable absolute constant $C$, then the system does not have non-zero solutions? (For my purposes, it would be fine to know that there are no non-zero solutions with at least $2n/3$ among $x_1,\dotsc,x_n$ pairwise distinct.)

An essentially equivalent restatement of the problem is as follows:

What is the smallest possible number of non-zero coefficients of a polynomial $P\in\mathbb F_p[x]$ of degree $\deg P\le p-1$ given that $P$ has a root of multiplicity $K$ at $x=1$?

There are many similar results and problems around (the Tarry-Escott problem, Linnik lemma, Vinogradov system, Borwein-Erdelyi-Kos results for polynomials over the integers, etc), and I suspect that the problem stated above has also been studied. Any references will be appreciated.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

If $P(x)$ is divisible by $(x-1)^K$ and $\deg P<p$, then $P$ has at least $K+1$ non-zero coefficients. Proof: divide $P$ by maximal possible power of $x$, take the derivative and use induction in $K$. Or what I get wrong?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This is perfectly correct and is attained on the polynomial $(x-1)^K$. I thought at some point of this polynomial, but somehow convinced myself that, translated back to the original system, it yields a solution with the $x_i$ equal to each other - which was totally wrong, as I now see. I will post a follow-up which is a closer approximation to the real problem that i need. $\endgroup$
    – Seva
    Apr 10, 2019 at 16:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.