3
$\begingroup$

The following is a part of a paper that I need to understand

enter image description here

I totally do not know the argument. Could you explain? Thanks.

Let $\Sigma_n$ be the $n$-th symmetric group and $\Sigma_\infty$ be the direct limit. Let $\Omega^nS^n$ be the $n$-iterated loop space on the $n$-sphere and $\Omega_k^nS^n$ be the subset of $\Omega^nS^n$ consisting of maps $S^n\to S^n$ of degree $k$. Let $\Omega^\infty_kS^\infty$ be the direct limit of $\Omega^n_kS^n$ with respect to $n$. I want to find references or explanations of the following items:

(1). $\Omega^\infty_0S^\infty$ is the Quillen plus construction on $B\Sigma_\infty$.

For any prime $p$,

(2). there is a "Frobenius map": $\Sigma_k\to \Sigma_{{k}\choose{p}}\int \Sigma_p$ (What does the integral mean?) which induces a "Kahn-Priddy map" $H_p:\Omega^\infty_0S^\infty\to \Omega^\infty \Sigma^\infty B\Sigma_p$.

(3). the Quillen plus construction gives a map $i: B\Sigma_p\to \Omega^\infty_0S^\infty$. This map induces a map $\theta_p: \Omega^\infty\Sigma^\infty B\Sigma_p\to \Omega_0^\infty S^\infty$.

(4). The composition $\theta_p H_p:\Omega_0^\infty S^\infty\to \Omega_0^\infty S^\infty$ is a "multiplicative $p$-local equivalence" (what means "multiplicative $p$-local equivalence"?).

Could you give a help for references or explanations? What do the above items mean?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For the Barratt-Priddy-Quillen theorem (your question (1)) I particularly enjoy the proof in Segal's "Categories and cohomology theories". The $\int$ sign in your question (2) is the wreath product of groups. And this is unfortunately all I can contribute. $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2015 at 2:35

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

For (1) Adams's book ``Infinite loop spaces'' contains good explanations. Also, a paper by Barratt and Priddy `On the Homology of Non-Connected Monoids and Their Associated Groups', I think is a good reference.

For (2), the maps you consider are the Stable James-Hopf invariants, and not Kahn-Priddy as far as I know, which arise from Snaith splitting. A good reference is Kuhn's paper on `The geometry of the James-Hopf maps'.

(3) and (4) are related to the extension of the Kahn-Priddy theorem (related to the case p=2 of Whitehead conjecture) to odd primes, and I think you can find proofs in Kuhn and Priddy's paper `The transfer and Whitehead's conjecture'

as well as more, what I call, `computation-free' work, in his other paper

`EXTENDED POWERS OF SPECTRA AND A GENERALIZED KAHN-PRIDDY THEOREM'.

Added, I think for the getting a $p$-local epimorphism $B\Sigma_p$ is not enough, and you need another $D_2$-factor for that. You may look at, Theorem 1.1(2) of the second paper for this extra factor.

EDIT: In general, for a path connected space $X$ the stable James-Hopf invariants are not multiplicative which you can see by homology computations; look at Kuhn's paper `The Homology of the James-Hopf maps'. But, in the cases such as $X=S^0$ you may get a map which deloops once, but probably not an infinite loop map, even not an $\Omega^2$ map in the case of $Q_0S^0\to Q\mathbb{R}P$; again look at Kuhn's paper on the homology, Remark 2.15. In that paper, the author shows that there is a choice $Q_0S^0\to Q\mathbb{R}P$ which deloops once. You probably can do the same of other $B\Sigma_r$ factors.

You may look at papers of Barratt and Eccles, as well as Kuhn, to see how one may get James-Hopf maps $QX\to QD_rX$ when $X$ is not path connected.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, Professor. I am still confused what means "multiplicative $p$-local equivalence"? $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2015 at 11:09
  • $\begingroup$ @user51233 Thanks! could you explain the part of the paper? I totally do not understand. $\endgroup$ Nov 12, 2015 at 12:03
  • $\begingroup$ @user51233 Thanks! could you explain the part of the paper? Thanks! $\endgroup$ Nov 12, 2015 at 12:04
  • $\begingroup$ I realised my answer was too long. So, I revised it. $\endgroup$
    – user51223
    Nov 13, 2015 at 18:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.