-2
$\begingroup$

I would like to know what articles are in the literature about the known as Firoozbakht's conjecture, see the Wikipedia Firoozbakht's conjecture.

Question. What articles have been published in journals whose main goal is the study of Firoozbakht's conjecture? Many thanks.

I'm interested to know it, since I'm not a professor, what articles were published in journals, these don't merely mentioning the conjecture: I am asking thus about articles dedicated to the study of the Firoozbakht's conjecture as a remarkable or the main goal of the article, or the studied subject of the articles that I evoke is very closely-related to the Firoozbakht's conjecture.

I know thus the following reference as an answer of my Question, this

Alexei Kourbatov, Upper Bounds for Prime Gaps Related to Firoozbakht’s Conjecture, Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 18 (2015), Article 15.11.2.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
15
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ @Carlo has been an active contributor to this site for eight years, 142929, I think he knows how the site works. Do you know how Math Reviews works? or Zentralblatt? Do you have access to a library? $\endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Commented Sep 18, 2019 at 13:00
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I would encourage you to use the search tools that are available nowadays. There is something satisfying about doing your own work, instead of asking others to do it for you. As for what you expect, I'm afraid you'll have to take what you can get. $\endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Commented Sep 18, 2019 at 13:12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You seem to be in the habit of making demands on people. I am not going to comply with your demand that I delete Timothy's comment, because it was made in good faith and intended to be helpful (it is not a call to close as duplicate), and indeed is potentially useful. (Moreover, you seem not to have understood why the linked question was closed as "no longer relevant".) I am complying with your demand to reply because your flag doesn't offer the option of replying privately. As noted by Gerry, you have exhibited little research effort, making the question not a very good one. $\endgroup$
    – Todd Trimble
    Commented Sep 19, 2019 at 9:08
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Advice: avoid the imperative mode when trying to get people to help you, and make a good attempt to answer your own question beforehand, rather than demand that distinguished mathematicians do your work for you (as Carlo Beenakker has done). $\endgroup$
    – Todd Trimble
    Commented Sep 19, 2019 at 9:12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Hm, you may need to look up what "imperative" means. When you tell someone to add an answer, or to delete a comment, or when you demand a moderator reply, without ever using the magic word "please": those are imperatives. Again, I would strongly urge you to avoid writing in that mode. I'll also say that people leave comments sometimes for readers in general, and not only for you -- you can think of your question as not really owned by you, but now part of the public commons. Thus, even if you don't consider Timothy Chow's comment useful to you personally, others might find it useful. $\endgroup$
    – Todd Trimble
    Commented Sep 19, 2019 at 11:04

1 Answer 1

Reset to default

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .