1
$\begingroup$

Let $f(t) : [0,\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ be an $L^1_\text{loc}$ function.

Then, I wonder if the following series \begin{equation} \sum_{n=1}^\infty e^{-n^2 T} \int_0^T e^{n^2 t} \lvert f(t)\rvert \, dt \end{equation} converges, where $T \in (0, \infty)$ is fixed.

This seems related to Dawson integral. Could anyone please help me?

Addition : I see that there can certainly exist $T \in (0,\infty)$ where the above series diverges. However, since $f$ is locally $L^1_\text{loc}$ on whole $[0,\infty)$, I hope that the above series converges for a.e. $T$. Would this be possible at least?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ No, $\int_0^T e^{n^2t}|f(t)|dt$ can be of any order of growth which is $o(e^{n^2T})$. So, if it is say proportional to $e^{n^2T}/n$ then the series would diverge. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 12:40
  • $\begingroup$ Ok I will edit the question to put stronger restriction on $f$. Thank you for your comment. $\endgroup$
    – Isaac
    Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 12:45
  • $\begingroup$ I assumed that $f$ is locally integrable on whole $[0,\infty)$ instead. Would this make a difference? $\endgroup$
    – Isaac
    Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 12:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @YemonChoi I think it is not too nice to say such harsh things, especially when your own intuition fails you. In fact, the updated version is true, and requires some non-trivial argument, I will now type the answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 14:29
  • $\begingroup$ @AlekseiKulikov I have withdrawn the comment, which was unduly influenced by the series of questions that the OP has asked. (I was assuming that taking $f(t)=\exp\exp(t)$ and that taking $T$ large enough will mean that $e^{n^2t}f(t) \geq e^{2n^2t}$ for all $t$ in "a sufficiently large interval", but from your comments it seems that I was too hasty in thinking this would be enough for a counterexample) $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 14:37

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The updated version is indeed correct. I will show that the sum is finite for almost all $T\in [1, 2]$ but it should be applicable for all $T\in (0, \infty)$.

The reason why the result can fail for a particular $T$ is that our function $f$ can resemble too closely $\delta$-function at the point $T$ so that we will be summing ones and get infinity. But in that case for (say) all smaller $T$ we will just have sum of zeroes and the sum will be finite. So, we have to somehow find balance between different $T$'s, and the natural way to do it is to introduce some averaging.

First, let us turn your sum into a more human-friendly form. By Fubini we have (I use $f(t)$ in place of $|f(t)|$ since we can always assume that $f$ is positive) $$\sum_{n = 1}^\infty e^{-n^2T}\int_0^T e^{n^2t}f(t)dt = \int_0^T f(t)\sum_{n = 1}^\infty e^{n^2(t-T)}dt.$$

The sum that we have here is a (half of) the theta-function, and asymptotics of it is known: it is proportional to $\frac{1}{\sqrt{T-t}}$ (at least in the regime $0 < T-t < 1$ that we will consider). In particular, since it is not in $L^\infty$, we can find $f$ such that for a given $T$ the integral would be infinite. But now we will use many $T$'s at once by integrating this over $T\in [1, 2]$. I will also assume that $f(t) = 0, t < 1$ for simplicity, for $T > 1$ this does not affect convergence issues at all. We have

$$\int_1^2 \int_1^T \frac{f(t)}{\sqrt{T-t}}dtdT = \int_1^2f(t)\int_t^2\frac{1}{\sqrt{T-t}}dTdt = \int_1^2f(t) 2\sqrt{2-t}dt \le \\2\int_1^2 f(t)dt < \infty,$$

since $f(t)$ is in $L^1_{loc}$. In particular, our sum is finite for almost all $T\in [1, 2]$.

Note that it is crucial that we have $n^2$ and not $n$, otherwise we would've had to integrate singularity of order $\frac{1}{T-t}$ which would give us unbounded $\log(T-t)$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, $n^2$ indeed seems crucial. Thank you for your answer. $\endgroup$
    – Isaac
    Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 15:34
  • $\begingroup$ So, it seems that my series is also in $L^1_{loc}[0,\infty)$ according to your argument? $\endgroup$
    – Isaac
    Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 15:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Isaac Almost, to be precise, in $L^1_{loc}(0, \infty)$, I didn't look at what happens near $0$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ Oh yes. You are absolutely right. $\endgroup$
    – Isaac
    Commented Jul 21, 2023 at 16:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .