MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is the normalization of a Cohen-Macaulay domain necessarily Cohen-Macaulay? I suspect that the answer is no, but I don't have a counterexample. I am most interested in "geometric" situations, so one can place assumptions like excellence on the domain if it's relevant.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 17 down vote accepted

No, take a normal non-Cohen-Macaulay $d$-dimensional projective variety $X \subseteq \mathbb{P}^n$ and do a series of generic projections from points not on the variety so that its image is a hypersurface $Y \subseteq \mathbb{P}^{d+1}$.

The generic hypersurface projection $Y$ will be Cohen-Macaulay (its a hypersurface), but the normalization is $X$, which is not Cohen-Macaulay.

share|cite|improve this answer

This is an algebraic and affine version of what Karl wrote. I could not produce a concrete example, but here is how one can try to do it.

Take a normal non-CM domain $B$ over some field of characteristic $0$ (see this question for some concrete examples). Find a Noether normalization $A \subset B$ (Macaulay 2 can do it for you).

Next, use the primitive element theorem to find $z \in B$ such that $R=A[z]$ has the same quotient field as $B$. Clearly then $\bar R = B$, and $R$ is a hypersurface since $A$ is a polynomial ring. The equation is likely to be messy, though.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.