jmd
-
Member for 5 years, 5 months
-
Last seen more than a week ago
comment
Prove/disprove a linear algebra inequality
Thanks, I corrected it. I meant "for $i\neq j$".
revised
Prove/disprove a linear algebra inequality
edited body
Loading…
revised
Prove/disprove a linear algebra inequality
edited body
Loading…
revised
Prove/disprove a linear algebra inequality
added 55 characters in body
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Are there quantifiers that require multiple "steps" to define?
Thanks and don't worry about it. The question is beautiful and I enjoyed puzzling it out.
awarded
comment
Are there quantifiers that require multiple "steps" to define?
Of course, hopefully the new version is clearer. I explained in more details the main inferences and removed an assertion that was not necessary for the reasoning and might thus have been misleading.
revised
Are there quantifiers that require multiple "steps" to define?
added 416 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Are there quantifiers that require multiple "steps" to define?
added 78 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Are there quantifiers that require multiple "steps" to define?
added 78 characters in body
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Sequential prize searching
I think there is a misunderstanding. The border cases are easy: $U_{max}(0,\cdot) = U_{max}(\cdot,0) = 0$, since you cannot search any room in either case.
comment
Sequential prize searching
I edited my answer to make it more explicit. I write a comment since I am not sure if you are notified of edits.
revised
Sequential prize searching
Added details about the dynamic programming.
Loading…
awarded
awarded
revised
Sequential prize searching
Removed ambiguity.
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded