Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Homotopy theory, homological algebra, algebraic treatments of manifolds.
38
votes
Analogue to covering space for higher homotopy groups?
My apologies for coming back to this old question, but I want to address a point that I think is not really addressed so far. Namely, for $n=1$, the universal cover of a (reasonable) topological space …
6
votes
Accepted
When do non-exact functors induce morphisms on $K$-theory?
As suggested by Dustin Clausen in his answer, polynomial functors induce maps on $K$-theory. In the setting of stable $\infty$-categories, you proved this in your joint work with Barwick, Glasman, and …
12
votes
Infinity-categorical analogue of compact Hausdorff
That's a good question! I think Barwick and Haine have thought much more about this, and maybe they already know the answer? What I say below is definitely known to them. Also beware that I've written …
18
votes
What are the potential applications of perfectoid spaces to homotopy theory?
Good question!
Actually, it seems unlikely that perfectoid methods per se play a key role in homotopy theory. The reason is that perfectoid things are "infinitely ramified", but there are theorems to …
27
votes
What is homology anyway?
For a long time (and still today), I very much shared the confusion of the OP. I think Jacob Lurie gives a very clear take on the standard perspective, but Mike Shulman does have a very valid contrast …
18
votes
Accepted
Is there a ring stacky approach to $\ell$-adic or rigid cohomology?
This is an interesting question.
First, I think the [PS] reference does not give the "correct" Betti stack. In my notes on 6 functors, I define a different stack $X_B$ such that $D_{\mathrm{qc}}(X_B)$ …