Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 6074

Homotopy theory, homological algebra, algebraic treatments of manifolds.

38 votes

Analogue to covering space for higher homotopy groups?

My apologies for coming back to this old question, but I want to address a point that I think is not really addressed so far. Namely, for $n=1$, the universal cover of a (reasonable) topological space …
Peter Scholze's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

When do non-exact functors induce morphisms on $K$-theory?

As suggested by Dustin Clausen in his answer, polynomial functors induce maps on $K$-theory. In the setting of stable $\infty$-categories, you proved this in your joint work with Barwick, Glasman, and …
12 votes

Infinity-categorical analogue of compact Hausdorff

That's a good question! I think Barwick and Haine have thought much more about this, and maybe they already know the answer? What I say below is definitely known to them. Also beware that I've written …
Peter Scholze's user avatar
18 votes

What are the potential applications of perfectoid spaces to homotopy theory?

Good question! Actually, it seems unlikely that perfectoid methods per se play a key role in homotopy theory. The reason is that perfectoid things are "infinitely ramified", but there are theorems to …
27 votes

What is homology anyway?

For a long time (and still today), I very much shared the confusion of the OP. I think Jacob Lurie gives a very clear take on the standard perspective, but Mike Shulman does have a very valid contrast …
Peter Scholze's user avatar
18 votes
Accepted

Is there a ring stacky approach to $\ell$-adic or rigid cohomology?

This is an interesting question. First, I think the [PS] reference does not give the "correct" Betti stack. In my notes on 6 functors, I define a different stack $X_B$ such that $D_{\mathrm{qc}}(X_B)$ …
Peter Scholze's user avatar