Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with measure-theory
Search options not deleted
user 5963
Questions about abstract measure and Lebesgue integral theory. Also concerns such properties as measurability of maps and sets.
7
votes
Symmetries of probability distributions
Maps such as $\eta$ and $\xi$ are called measure-preserving and are studied in ergodic theory. In particular ergodic theory views these as dynamical systems, because the maps can be iterated. One th …
- 4,713
3
votes
Extreme couplings
The finite and infinite cases are actually quite different for this problem. In the simpler version of the finite case where $X=Y$ and $\mu=\nu$, you can show that the extreme points are introduced b …
- 8,501
1
vote
Accepted
identically distributed random variables and measure-preserving transformations
No. Take for example the case where $\Omega = [0,1]$ with Lebesgue measure, $X$ is the identity, and $Y = 2X\mod 1$. Then you ask for $T = X\circ T = Y$ almost surely, but changing $Y$ on a set of m …
- 8,501
5
votes
Accepted
Transfer independance from $\mathbb{N}$ to $\mathbb{N}^2$
If the sequence $X_1,X_2,\ldots$ has finite range, then this is impossible except in the trivial way mentioned by Emil.
The "input" random variables (e.g. $X_1$) all have equal and finite entropy $a$ …
- 8,501
5
votes
Accepted
Measurability of sets of pairs
Without regularity at least, such pathologies can happen. In fact, taking products is not necessary to get them. It can happen that with $A\subset X$ we have $\nu_1(A)\neq \nu_2(A)$. Taking the pro …
- 8,501
16
votes
Accepted
Is Conway's base-13 function measurable?
Call the support set $S$. The answer is yes it is Lebesgue measurable and no, it has zero measure. It is even Borel measurable, which would take a tiny bit more effort to prove.
Note that $S$ is in …
- 8,501
10
votes
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in Lebesgue Theory
As I recall Chapter 7 of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis has a good presentation of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in the context of Lebesgue integration.
- 8,501